The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance, fol. 135
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.77.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- dau
- asitr
- M
- 5.t
- uris
- dedine
- e1
- Ma
- ind
- bink rt
- D
- it
- rabet
- orta
- 1on,
- cest
- Bat
- al
- bun
- Gd
- 135
- He soichthac no Pan ean postibiy beunjust, _c.
- Acainst iis he replies that the Lam cf Phiaraoh te dronn
- he Male Children os ehe Theaelices; andof Nebuekadnerxar
- to worstip the solden mase; and of Darius acainst prayins 10
- any but him inthirey dazes; and os Ahactuero to destroythe
- sewes; andos tho Pharilees ro excommunicate the confessors of
- Christ, vero all unjust Lavcs. The Larves of these Kines as
- chey vere Lames have relation onely to the menthat vere their
- subjects; And the matine of them, which mas che actionof e-
- very one ofthose Kings, irho vere subjects to another Kine.
- nametu 10 God almichiys, had relation tothe Lam of Cod.
- Inthefirst relation there could beno iniustice inthem; because
- al Lams made by him to mhom the people had siventhe Lesista-
- tive Pover, are the ACs of every one of that people; and no
- man can doininsticeto bimsels. But in relation to Cod, if Cod
- havehy a Lam forbiddenit, the makine of such Fames is inja-
- sice. Wrhich LaW of Cod was tothose Feathen Princes noother
- bucCalus populi, thasis to saythe properest use of their natural
- reason forthe preservation of their subjects. Is thereforethose
- Lames vere ordained oust of mantonnessor cruelty, or envy, or
- for chepleasine of a Favorite, er out of any other senisterend, as
- it seemes they vere, ihe matins of those Lames mas unjust.
- But is in riehe Reason theymere necessary for the preservation
- of those people of rehom they had underrahenthe cbaree, ihen
- vas it not uniust. Ana for the Pharilees nho had the same
- rritten Lamof God, that ve have, their excommunication of
- ihe Christians, procceding Cas it did) Fromenoy, vas an Aet
- os malicions injustice. Is ic had proceeded frem misinterpreta-
- tionoftheir omn Scriptures, it had been a fin of ignorance. Ne
- vertheless, asit mas a Lam to their subjects (in case thez. had
- the Lesistarive Porver, mhish Idonbtof) ibe Lam mas not un-
- just. But chematins of il mas anuniust action, of mhichthey
- vere to sive acconnt to none but God. T fear the Bistrop
- ill ehine this discourse t00 subtile, but the judeement is ihe
- Readers.
- Tho ground oP ehis error, _c. i5 this. Fbat every
- manmates by his contene che Law. which he is bound. 10
- Recp, _c.
- TB
Cite
The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance, fol. 135. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0147?run=74