Search the Nachlass

The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance, fol. 134

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. 134)
  2. otber thinesare possible at least in themselves. Raisine from
  3. the dead, changine the course of nature, malins of a nem Flea
  4. ven, and a nem F. arth, are thines possible in themselves; for
  5. there is norbine in their nature able toresist the Willof od;
  6. and if Lars do not preseribe such thines, hy sould Lbelieve
  7. they preseribe other thines thatare mere impossible. Did hee-
  8. ver readin Suarer of any Tyrant that made a L. an commandine
  9. ans mantodo, and nocto do the same Action, or tobe and noe
  10. te be et the same place, in one and the same moment of time.
  11. But ont of the doctrine of Xecessity, it follometh he sayes, Ihat
  12. alI P. aires do preleribe ablolure impossibilicieseo be done.
  13. Fere hehas left ont in chemselves, nhich is a milsult Falla-
  14. y
  15. Fle furthor sazes that Tust Laves are che Ordinances ot
  16. rishic Keason, mhich is an error that hath cost many tbonsands
  17. ofmentheir lives. Was there exer Kine that made a Lam
  18. hich in rieht reason had been berter unmade: and Ballihose
  19. Tares therefore not be obered? Sall me rather rebellE. TThinte
  20. not, thoneh amnie se creat a Divine ashe.think rather
  21. thatihe Reason of him that haththe Soveraien Anthority; and
  22. bynhose Smord me look tobe prorected, bothacainst mar from
  23. abread, and injaries ac home, mhether itbe Righe or Frroni-
  24. ons in it sests, ouche rostand for Richttons thatbave submit
  25. redour selves thereunto by receivine the prorection.
  26. Bat the Bistrop parcch his createst considende inthis, chat
  27. xhetber the chines beimpossible in themselves, or made imposse
  28. ble by some unscen accident, zet there is no reason thac men should
  29. be punimed for noc doins chem. Tr seemes heraketh punist
  30. mene foralind of revense, andcan never therefore acrec with
  31. me thatrale it for nothine else but for a correction, or for an
  32. example, nhich hath for end rhe Framins and neceltcacine of
  33. theWiUIro viriue; and that he is no 500d man, ihat upon any
  34. provocation useth his poiver, (thonch a porver lavo sullys obcained)
  35. to asstict anorher man michour this end, toreforme the ill of him
  36. oroibers. Nor can Loemprchend (as havine onely humant T
  37. dea s) that thac punistment which neither intendeth the cor-
  38. rectionof rhe offender, nor the correction of othersby eaample
  39. doth proeced frem 60d.

Cite

The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance, fol. 134. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0146?run=74