The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance, fol. 233
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.92.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- 233
- porver eo refuse what he ils, and eo suspend his omn apperite;
- for to refuse rhat one willeth imply eth a contradiction; th. whict
- also is made muchmore absurd by his expression; for hesaith, the
- Will bath pover to refuse rhat it Wils, and eo suspend its orn
- Apperire, mhereas ehe NVIII, and che Villins, and ehe Appecice
- is the same thine. Ile adds that eren che burnine ofche fire, it
- ic De considered, as ic is inrested wich all parricular circum
- stances, is noc so necectar an Action as T. FI. imasineth.
- Tle doth not suffcienely understand ohat Limarine. For Lima-
- sine, thatofthe fire wtich sall burn tive lundred rears hence, L
- maytruly say nov, it sallburn necessarily; and os that vohict Ball
- nt burn then. (for fire may sometimes not burnthe combustible
- marter chcovn inte it, as in the case of the three Chilaren) that it
- is necessary it sall not burn.
- (m) (Tuo chines are required eo matie an L.fect necessa-
- xy. First, chac ic be produced b a necessary couse, _ec. Se-
- condlv, chacic be necellarily produced, ecc.) T0this Ysay no-
- thine butchat l’understand nor ho a cause can be necessary, and
- the Fffect not be necessarilys produced.
- (n) TM, second reason apainst chis distinction of Liberey
- From compultion, buc noc trom necellirarion, isnem, and de-
- monstraces cleeriy, chac to necesticare che Wil by a Pivsicol
- neceslier, isro compel theWil, lo Far asthe Wil is capabie ot
- compulsion; and chac he, wtro doch necellicare che Wil cO
- eril atcer et ac manner, is cheerue couse oF evil, _c.) By iis
- second reasen, which hesars is nem and demonstrates, exc. Ican-
- not find what reason le means; for rhere arebut rvo, whereof ele
- later is in thes. Words; Secondy, eo rip up theborcom otchis
- Dusiness, this I eake coberhe clear resolurion ofthe Schoolss
- There is a double Act oFche Wil, the one more remore called
- Imperatus, Cc. The ocher Actis nearer, called Actus F lici-
- tus, 8C. But Tdorbt nhether this beit hemeans or no. For chis
- beine the resolution ofthe Schools, is notnev; and beine a distin-
- ciion onely, is no demonstration; thonsh perhaps he may usethe
- vord demonstrarion, as every unlearne d man non a days docs, t0
- Cenifie any Nronment ofbisomn. As for the dstinction it sels,
- becanserheterms are Larine, and neveruse d by any Author of che
- Latine tongue, eo Ben their impertinence, Lexpounded them in
- Enslisto
Cite
The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance, fol. 233. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0233?run=74