Leibniz Legible

Machine transcription of the Leibniz Nachlass

Search the Nachlass

The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance, fol. 244

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.85.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. t
  2. Animadversions upon tho Bictops
  3. Reply Numb. X X II.
  4. Ca, C) He chird pretence was out ofMoral Philolophy mil-
  5. underttood, chac ourward objects de necellicare the
  6. NNilI.) Tcannot imac ne how chequestion, hether outmard ob-
  7. jects de necessitate or nat nec ssicare the Wil, can any siay bere-
  8. ferredto Moral Philosophr. Lhe principles of moral Philosophy
  9. are the LaWs. vbererith ommardbjects bave liile todo, as
  10. beine for the most part inanima e, s huch follon alvayes theforce
  11. of nature wittont respect to moral Lans Nor canL conceive rhat
  12. purpose hehad robrine this into his Reply co my ansiver, wherein L
  13. attribute nothine inthe Action o ourmard obgeits +0 Noralliry.
  14. (b) CHis Arst excepcion is, thac ic is noc macerial cHaC thC
  15. porver of ourmard objects de proceed fromour ovnfaules, is luch
  16. faults os ours preceed noc from causes in our oon pover. WVelI.
  17. buc whac ischer do proceed trom caules, chat arc in our omn
  18. pover, as in cruch chey do, thien his anEver is a meer subcer-
  19. FusC. B. + hem pr 2she that in truch they do: Becaule else, saith
  20. he, che, are noc our Faules ac aII.) Very mell reasoned. A Forse
  21. is lame frors a cause chat was not in his pov.r; therefore ihe lame-
  22. nessis no faultinthe Forse. P ut his meani,e is, ta no injustice
  23. uni. se che causes ivere in his conpover; as is it vere not injustice
  24. whatsoever is nillinely aone acainst the Law, whatsoev rit be
  25. that isthe cause o the Wil to do it.
  26. 5)) Neer he contestech chac ic is in our pover by g00d
  27. endearours to alcer chose vicious habies etich wehad con-
  28. tracted, and ro set checoncrarv habIEs There is no such con-
  29. fession in myansm r. T said, Praver, Paltirs, Rc. May alcer
  30. Ourhrabies. But Lnever said chat theWi ro Pray, Fast exc. is
  31. in our von pover. Frue (Paih ne but then t’e contrary habit
  32. doch nec. ssiiate rhe on. Vay, as Well as che former habit did l’eother
  33. may. By wtich verr consideration ic appeors, chac chac wtich
  34. he calIs a necestier, is no more buc a Proclivier. IFic vere à
  35. erue neceltier, ic contd noc. be aroided, nor alcered by our
  36. endearours. Acain hemistates, for L Said that PlaY er, F a
  37. AInZ, ec.
  38. Ht
  39. 1
  40. He
  41. e

Cite

The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, And Chance, fol. 244. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1030877386:0244?run=74