Leibniz Legible

Machine transcription of the Leibniz Nachlass

Search the Nachlass

A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. -

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. The Contents.
  2. Further 1o be observed, That many of) oloey of ihe PASanS, their PerIONA-
  3. ihe Pasan Theolozers; Seemed to 50 ret cins and Deilyins the Natures OF chines;
  4. a Strain tigher, they supposine COd not and Tnanimate Substances. That ihc
  5. onely to Pervade all chings, but also to Ancient Poccick Pables of the Codsvere
  6. Behim selE all chings. That the Ancient many ofihem in their sirst and true mean-
  7. lErprian Theoloey ran so hiel, Fvident ins, thus Phytiolozicallr Allesorieal, and
  8. From the Sairicle Inseripeion. A strone not meer HerolosY, affirmed aeainst Lu
  9. Tans hereos in A Ichy lus; as also in Lu-
  10. Can. Neither vas this proper to those,
  11. Scbius. Zeno, Cleanthes and Cherlippus.
  12. Famons for thus AllesOrizine che l’ables
  13. oho held Cod to bethe Soul oEcheWorid, OE the Cods. Chry sippus his Allexori-
  14. but ihe Lanenace also of those other more (zins an Oblcene Dicture of jupiter and
  15. Resined Philo(opheis, Xenophanes, PAr. Juno in SamOS. Plato thouels no L’riend
  16. menides, exc. ihey assirmins Cod, 10 be 1o these Pocticle Fables, yet confesses some
  17. Onc and AII. With mhich aereeth the os them to have contained Allesories in
  18. Anthour of ihe ACelexian Dialosue, ihat ihem: the sae doth also Dionylius II2
  19. Ood is, Onus omnia, One aIl chinss; and licarnaaus: and Cicero likevise, who
  20. that besore thines vere made he did then assirmett, ibis Pertonatines and Deilyine
  21. apenten Hide chem, or Occulely contain ihe Natures OC chines, to have Cllec chc
  22. ihem alI, ichin him (CIE. In lite man-
  23. ner Orphieus.
  24. PagC506, 507
  25. Worid rich Supersticion. P18C510, 512
  26. Acainst Pulebius again, That rhe mhole
  27. This not onely a further Ground of ihe Theology of ihe PASANS, consisted not in
  28. Polyonymy oF One Cod, accordins 10 thus Deityins che Natures OE chines, and
  29. Ihe Varions Manifestations os himsels in Tnanimate Bodies; because he ihut ac-
  30. Phaenomenon in the Pasan TheOlOBY,
  31. IBeir PerTonatins ihe TmaniatE PArIS of
  32. ihc Norid, and Natures OE chinss, and
  33. momledeeth no Animant Cod, actnom-
  34. ledees no God at all, but is a domnrieht
  35. Achcist.
  36. Neither ought ibis Physioloxicat The-
  37. bestomine ihe Names of Gods and Cod- oloey ef ihe PAGANS, ihat consisted in
  38. deltes upon them. Thus Moschopulus be- Pertonatins and Deilyins cheNacuresot
  39. fore cited and ArnObiuS. This Plutarch chines and tmanimate Bodies, 10 be Con-
  40. ihints 1o have been done at first, Metony- fonnded, with ihat Nacural and Philoso.
  41. mically onelys ihe Fffects of ihe CocS, be- phical Theoloey of Varro, Scavola and
  42. ine called GodS; as ihe Bools of Plato,
  43. Plato. And thus far not distiked byhim.
  44. But himself complaineth, that aftermaras,
  45. others, which admitted of no other, but
  46. Animant Oods, and siet as RCally PX.
  47. ilted in Naure: for whieh C ause it vas
  48. it vas carried on further by Superctitions called Nacural, in opposirion 10 the licti
  49. Rclisionicts, and not withont ereat Impi-
  50. CIV. Nevertheless that Tnanimate Sub.
  51. Cances and ihe Nacures oF chines, vere
  52. cious and Phancastiek, Pocrick Ood5.
  53. S. Austiris just Censure aud Condem
  54. Formerly Deispec by ihe AnCienE PasanS, nation of the Pagans, for their thus Theo-
  55. obermise ihan Meconrmically, proved losirins oE Phylioloer, or Pictitionsv
  56. Trom Cicero, Philo and Placo. For they Pertonacins and Dcilyins che Natures
  57. Supposine God, 10 Perracle aII chines, and OF chines.
  58. 512, 512
  59. 10 be AII chines, did therefore look npon But Thoneh the Pasans did ihus verbal-
  60. every thins as Sacred or Divine; and ly Personate and Deisie Ihe chineS OE Na-
  61. Theologie che Pars OF hc Worid and cure, yet did not the Intellicent amon est
  62. NatureSOF PhinOS; Tirmlarty matine ihem, them therefore acconnt these True anc
  63. Codsand Ooddelles. But especially such Prover Oods. Cora in Ciecro, Thonels
  64. thines, as mberein Humane Ucilicy wes me calt Corn Ceres, and IVine BacChUS,
  65. most concerned; and whicts hac most of vet vas there never any one so mad, a5 10
  66. 507, 510 tahe that for a Cod, which hinssels sceds
  67. Lhis property, ibe Physioloxient IHe. upon and devours. The P.8nS really ac
  68. conntect
  69. Nonder in IBeM.

Cite

A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. - . Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0137?run=74