Leibniz Legible

Machine transcription of the Leibniz Nachlass

Search the Nachlass

A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. -

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. The COntents.
  2. and (e +a Be AII Cod. Not barely as noted by MaceobiuS. Thus vere al IbC
  3. Malter, but by reason of the Soul thereos. PaganS Wortd- W orstripverS, in disserent
  4. PaGC534, 535
  5. Nom if the WVhole Worid Animated
  6. be the Supreme Ood, then must all ihe
  7. ParEs and Members of the Worid be the
  8. Parts and Members of One God; but
  9. not themselves therefore property se Many
  10. Senses: but not asa Dead and Inanimme
  11. Thing, but cither as the Body oF Ood,
  12. or else as his Temple or Lmagc. PaBC
  13. 537,53
  14. Furthermore, ihe Pasans Dniversally
  15. achmomledeine ihe Wortd 1o bean Animal
  16. Oods. This affirmed by Orisen, as the those of rhem nho supposed it not 10 be 1be
  17. Tiuc Sense os These Parans, aeainst that First and Highes Ood, conceived it 10 be
  18. unvary Assertion of C eluS, That I5 the either a Second, or else a Phird Cod;
  19. Whole vere Cod, then must che Several and so WVorstripped it, not onely as a Tem-
  20. Parts thereof necds bc Cod5.
  21. 535
  22. Dle or Image, but also as the Son of the
  23. Wherefore thoneh these PasanS Dcited First Coc. Celus pretended ihe Chricti-
  24. the PATES OF che Worid and NatureS OF ans 10 have called iheir JcuS, Ihe SOn ot
  25. Thines, as vell as the POWerS OF che Ood, in lmitation of these PABaNS, ho
  26. Mundane Soul; vet did not the Intellieent Atyled ihe Worid so.
  27. amonest them Worstip them severally, as
  28. So many Pruc and Proper Oods, but one-
  29. 539, 540
  30. Thus have me made it fully 10 appeaI,
  31. That, accordine tothe Sagine os Ancisthe-
  32. Gy as the PartS and MCmbErS Of OnC CrCAE nes, the Muny POpular COcS of IhC P-
  33. Animal or Cod; or rather Worstip the
  34. sreat Mundane Soul (The Lise of the
  35. Whole Worid) in them all. This proved
  36. From S. Austin.
  37. 536,537
  38. The same plainly declared also by ihe
  39. Paans in AChanasius, That not Ihe Di
  40. vided PartS of the Worid vere by them
  41. acconnted so many several OodS, but
  42. SAHS vere but One and che SaIC NATU-
  43. ral God; or, accordine 10 that os luelides,
  44. their Many Oocs vere but Mlany Names.
  45. S0 that neither their Poccical, nor uet
  46. their Policieal Pheolor, mas loott upon by
  47. them as True ane NacurII.
  48. 540
  49. Nevertheless, ihe Witer PAGANS PCrr-
  50. rally concluded, that ibere ouelot 10 be ano-
  51. the Whole, made ux of them Al, Onc iher TheOlOBY, besides ihe NaTUITAI, sitty
  52. Ood; mhich yet mieht be morstipped in Calculated for ihe Vulsnr, and havine a
  53. its Teveral ParIS.
  54. 537
  55. Mixture of Falsehood and l’abuloluuy in
  56. it. Varro and Scaevola aereed, that IhC
  57. The Parans beine thus divided, a5 10
  58. their Opinions, concernine the Nacural Vulear beine Oncapable os ihe Fruc and
  59. Nacural TheolOeY, it mas expedient (or
  60. and True Theoloer; some os them Nor-
  61. them 10 be Deccived in cheir Relision.
  62. Sipped the Worid as ihe Body oF Cod,
  63. but others onty as his Imase or Temple. Scrabo also, that the Mlear cannot by Phi-
  64. lolophick Renton, and Pimeh, be currieet
  65. Lhus Plutarch, thoneh distikine the Dei-
  66. vins of Tnanimate Thines, did noroith. on 10 Piety; but this nust be done by
  67. standine approve of Worstrippine Cod in Supersticion, and by itse help of Pables,
  68. che Whole Wortd, as his most Sacred and Prodisious Relaions. Ile sne
  69. lemple. And Ihe Pertian Magi, allom- partly actmomledeed by Synetuus for truC.
  70. ne of no Artisiciall Temples, made with Plato also; That it is Harc eo sinel our
  71. mens hands. Norstipped God sub Dio, Ood, but Impoltible 10 dectare him 10
  72. and upon the TOpS OEMOuntainS, as con- che VulB; and therefore a necessity of.
  73. cervine the Whole Worid 1o be his Na- Civil Theoloer, distinet from ihe NALU
  74. 540, 543
  75. cural Temple. For the same Reason dic ral and Philolophical.
  76. XXXV. We conse nom 10 1benext chive
  77. ihey condemn also ArtitiCiaIL SCatUCS and
  78. Images, concludine Fire, Parth, and WNa- Proposed, That, besides this Scemine aril
  79. ter, and ihe like Parts of the Worid, 10 be Phancacticte Polycheilm of 1hC P381IS,
  80. ihe Nacural Imases ot che Deity. Thus which mas nothine but ihe Polyonymy ol
  81. Dino in Clemens Alexandrinus. This One Cod, they had anorter LE call Poly-
  82. Disserense amon est 1he Pasan Theolozers cheilm, even in sheir Nacural and Phuilo.
  83. Cophiete

Cite

A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. - . Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0141?run=74