Search the Nachlass

A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. -

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. The Contents.
  2. ther vere not meer Dead POrIS, as PI- herence 1o the Divine Word in a Pra-
  3. cures upon Paper, or Carved SCaVCS. existent State; mhich he monid prove
  4. And thus did not onclu Amelius un- from Scripture. But is a Rank of Souls
  5. derstand S. Jotn, concernine the L0705, belon Hlumane, and Specisically differine
  6. Whatsoever mas made mas Lise in him, from them, as Orisen himsels confesses
  7. but alse divers of the Ancient Fachers, those of Brutes 10 be; no reason ohythere
  8. Crecke and Latin. This Deityins of 1.
  9. mieht not also be other Rantes or Species
  10. deas, but a Piece of Payan POctrY. Superiour 10 them.
  11. P23C562,563
  12. PaGC 566, 567
  13. But least of all ean me assent 1o Orisen,
  14. Lastlo. mhereas Proctus and otbers ohen from this Principle, That alt Souls
  15. interminele many Parcicular OodS, with are Esencially endued with Frec WilI.
  16. those Three UniverFal Aypostales, as and therefore in their Nature Peccable,
  17. Henades and Asathoretes, Unities and he infers those Enellels Cireuits OE Souls,
  18. Coodnestes, SubstantiaII above the First Elxrards and Dorrnirards, and conse-
  19. Incelleet: ayd NOeS, Particular Minds quently denies them any Fixed State of
  20. or Intellects above the First Soul; This Holinels and Fappinels by Divinc Oracc:
  21. Hypochelis of theirs, altosether lrratio- an Assertion contrary to ihe Tenour and
  22. nall and Absurd: there beine Nothins P. s. Promises of the COspell. Thus per-
  23. sentially Groodness. Wisedom, and Sancti- haps that 1o be understood, That Christ
  24. ty, but the Threc Dirine Aypostales, al broughe Lise and Immorcalier c0 Liphe
  25. otber Beines havine onely a l’articipation chorouxh the Co(pell: not as if he mere
  26. thereof. Thus Orisen expresty; who the Lirst mho taneht the SoulS TmmIOr-
  27. Theresore achmom lede eth no hieher Rank os calier, athine believed besore by ihe Ph
  28. Created Beines, Ihen such as Ihe Placo. rilaiete Jerrs, and Generality os PagAnS;
  29. nists ca Sole that are SClE. moveable, but because these held their Lnelles l’ran-
  30. Vically Unicablero Bocics, and Peccable. migrations and Circuies, therefore mas he
  31. With whom aereethS. Terome, and otbers the sirst mho broneht everlactins Lite ane
  32. os ihe Fachers, That God is the onely Im- Happinels eo Liphc.
  33. Deccable Bcine; but al UInderstandins
  34. 567, 568
  35. That Origen a man mell stilled in the
  36. Creatures Prec Willed, and LapCabIC. Placonick L. carriine, and se much addi-
  37. 564, 565 Et ed tothe Dormata thereos, vould never
  38. An Opinion of Simplicius, that even have conesofar intothat olter Lxtremetu
  39. in that Rank of Beines called Souls ihere been any Solidier otRCaTON, (or ei
  40. (Hhoneh not Fssentially immutable, but ther those Henades, or NOCS, of Ihe L. AL-
  41. SelEmoveable) some are of se hieh a cer Platonists. This Opinion all one ge
  42. Pach as that ihey ean never Degenerate, is a Christian sould sippose, besides ibe
  43. nor Sink or Fall into Vicions Llabits. Inso. First Person- or Pacher, a Multitude
  44. much that he mates a onestion whether os l’arcicular Paternicies, Superiour 10
  45. XOarC(IS belone 10 them or no. 565, 566 the Second Perton; and also besides 1be
  46. But whatever is 1o be thoucht of ihis, One Son, or Word. a Multiinde of Parti-
  47. Oripen 100 far in the orher Lxtream, in cular Sons or Words, Superiour 10 ibe
  48. dengine any orter Rants of Souls above Phird, the Holy ChoT. This plainly 10
  49. Plumane; and supposine alt the Disse- mate a Breach npon theDCIEY, and 10 in-
  50. rence that is nom betroixt the hiehest troduce a company of such Creaturely
  51. ANCIS, and MCn, 10 bave procceded onty Gods, as imply a Contradiction in their
  52. from their Merits, and different uses of very Nocion.
  53. their Prec Will; his Reason beine this,
  54. 566
  55. Lastly, ihis not ihe Cactolicke Doctrine
  56. because God would be ottermise a Prolo- of the Platonicle School neither, but a
  57. Poleptes or ACCEPEET OE PerTONS. Jhis Private Opinion onely of Come late Do-
  58. also Fixtended by him 10 ihe Soul of our etours. No Footsteps of those Henaces and
  59. Saviour Chrilt; as not Partiully chosen Aachoretes to be found ang mbere in
  60. 10 that Dixniey, but for ils P’aillifull ad (Plaro; nor get in Plocinus. This L. Ln.
  61. S11ABC

Cite

A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. - . Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0145?run=74