Leibniz Legible

Machine transcription of the Leibniz Nachlass

Search the Nachlass

A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. -

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.89.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. IhC Contents.
  2. suase hre Oider ihem Proclus. Nor Ciceros Oods by whose Providence ihC
  3. does Placo speak of any ABAraCE or SCPA. Worid and all ils Parrs vere framed.
  4. race Mind, save onely One: His Sccond
  5. chines abont the Sccond, beine Idc2S; as
  6. PaBC572, 573
  7. The Seeond Aypoctasis in Llacos Pri-
  8. his Thirds abont the Third Created BC- niey, to vit, Mind or Incellect, unquestio
  9. ines. Plocinus also donbi full and stacee- nably ETernal and withont Becinmins.
  10. rine abont these NOCS, he scemine some- The same afsirmed by llocinus also, of thC
  11. times 1o mabe them but ihe Hleads or Sum-
  12. Third HIyPOCTaSS, or PCyche, called ihe
  13. micies of Souls. WVheresorethis PSeudo. Word ot ihe Second, as ihe Sccond, ihe
  14. Placonicke Friniey so be Exploded, as WordoCche First. Porphurius his Te-
  15. Contoundine the Disferences betroixt simony 10 this purpose in S. C yril; where
  16. Ood and ihe Creature. Whereas ihe also Mind, or the Sccond Dirine Hyposta-
  17. Christian Frinier HomorencaII, alt Dei- AIS, (thoneh said 10 have been Becolten
  18. CY Or CreaTOUT; allother thines beine sup- from ihe First, ret) called ouronra
  19. Posed 10 be the Creatures ofthose Fhrec and aurozros, IIS On- PareNE, and ils
  20. lypoctales, and produced by their Zoyni- Own. OAsprins, and said 10 have sprune
  21. Concurrence and Iustrence; they beine alt ont ouroibrcs, SelF BesOtenty. PagC
  22. Rcally but One Cod. Pa∞C568, 570
  23. Nevertheless, these forementioned DC
  24. 573,574.
  25. This Mlysterions Ridele exponnded ont
  26. pravacions and Adulcerations of That Di- of P locinus. Jhe plain meanine ibereos
  27. vine Cabbala of ihe Priniey, not 10 be no more ihen ihis, That thoueh ihis Seconc
  28. charecd upon Placo Bimsel( nor alttheTypoctalis procceded from ihe FIrH, vet
  29. otber Anciene Placonists and PychaBOTC. vas it not produced by it after a Crea
  30. ans; some of hich approached se near 1o curely manner, nor Arbitrarionsty by Will
  31. ihe Christian Frinier, as 10 malie their and Choice, but in may of Nacural and
  32. Threc Hypostates alt truly Divine, and Necesary Lmanation. Thus have some
  33. Creacours, other thines beine ihe Creatures Chrictians ventured 10 call 1he L. OpO5, ou-
  34. of IBCM.
  35. ibid. 26dror, and L. X scip(o Deum, Cod From
  36. First pherefore Placo himsels, in his
  37. Timaus, carefully distinenisteth berroixt
  38. nimseIF.
  39. 574, 573
  40. Dionysius Pecavius, havine declared
  41. Cod and ihe Creature, and determineth ihe Doetrine of Arius, ihat the l’ather
  42. ihe bounds of cach, ascer ihis manner. was ihe onely Lternal Cod, and ihe SOn,
  43. Thas ehe FirR, is that hich AlvayS IS, or Word a Creature, made in Time, and
  44. and Was never Made; ihe Sccond, that ont of Nothine: Concludes it undeniabli
  45. robich is Made and had a Bexinnine but manisest from bence, that Arius vas a
  46. pruely ISnOL. Hlis meanine here perverred German, Truc, and Genuine Placonist.
  47. by junior Placonists, nhom Boerius also Whereas il is most certain from Bence-
  48. follomed. WVbere Placo takes it for gran- thac Arius vas no llaconistat all; andthat
  49. red, That whassoever bath a Temporary Pecavius himself did not vell understand
  50. and Succestire Duration, hadt a Beeim- the Placonicte Doctrinc. Llad Plato deni-
  51. nine; and rhassoever had no Beeinnine, ed ihe Pternity of his Second Hypostalis.
  52. Bath HO SUICCCCTIVC, BHE PETMANENEDUTA- called NOUS, he must have denied thC L
  53. ion; and se concludes, That whatsoever cernier of Wiledom and Understandins
  54. is lternall, is Cc; but mhatsoever ex- it sels; ibis beine 10 him ihat Wiledom
  55. iss in Time, and bath a Bexinnine, CrCa- by Which Cod himsels is Wile, and mherebs
  56. 570, 572 he made ihc WVorid. Wich which aercett
  57. No toPlaco, more Eternall Gods ihem also AChanaliUS; Our L ord is Wiledom
  58. TUTC.
  59. Onc. Whichnor Ideas or NOemaLA, butrne and nos Second to any orher Wisedom:
  60. SubstancialI Thingo; his Firs, SccOnd, and, The Father OF the Word is nOL
  61. and Third, in his Fpistle 10 Dionysius, or himselFWord: and, THAL WWAS HOE Word
  62. Triniey of Divinc Hypoctases, ihc Ma- and Wicedom, wrtich produced Worc
  63. Keto or Creacours of ihe whole Worta. and Wisedom. This in opposition, 10
  64. AriuS.

Cite

A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. - . Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0146?run=74