Search the Nachlass

A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. -

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. Lhe Contents.
  2. Sense restored. Svident ehat Orisen distin- Tuch. But is eveeY SuPPOTed Part OF a SOUI,
  3. Enisteth, ibe Ed Z. cur in S. PauI, (Transtated, be Soul, and oE a Mind, Mind; iben vould
  4. Pabernacle,) fromthe Farchiy Houle; heun-
  5. derstandine bythe former, a Thin Spiricuous B0.
  6. dV. which is a Midale betwixs the Larchly and
  7. ihe Deavenir and obich ihe Soul remaineth still
  8. all buc One be Supercuous; or Rvery Onc be
  9. che Whole: wbich oannot be in Excended
  10. chinss.
  11. PaBC822, 829
  12. Acain, Plocinus endeavours to Prove, from
  13. elorbed wiih, after Deach. This Opinion of ihe Energies of iheSoul, ibat itis unexcended
  14. Orivens, That the Soul ascer Deach, not quite Because it is One and ihe Same Indivisible chine.
  15. deparate from al BOdY, never reckoned ux in that Perecivethihe mhole Sentible Object. Ibis
  16. ihc Catalogue oF his RrrOUTS. Orig en not further pursued; IF ihe Soul be Fxcended, then
  17. Taxed by Methodius, for asserrine Souls 10) must it either be One Phy licalIPOInE, or MOre.
  18. Have Bodies, but for not assertins ihem 10 BC Impossible Thet it sould be buc One PhylicaII
  19. Bodies; ihere beine no truly lncorporealI Sub-
  20. stance, accordine eo Mechodius. but ihe Deiey.
  21. This One of ihe Fxtreams mentioned. And ih0
  22. Origenicke Hypothelis, 1o be preferred before
  23. that of Mechodius.
  24. Page 817, 820
  25. Alreadu Observed, That Origen not Sineu.
  26. tar, in ihis Opinion concerninq Hlumane SouIS;
  27. Trenaus, Philoponus. Joannes Thessaloni-
  28. centis, PTellus and orbers, asserrine the same.
  29. S. Auttine in his De Gen. ad LIC. Grantetb.
  30. That Souls alter Deach eannot be carried 10 any
  31. CorporalI Places, nor L Ocally Moved, without
  32. aBodr. Himself seems eo tbink ihc Punist-
  33. ment of SoulS, before the Resurrection, 10 be
  34. PhrancasticaII. But sives Liberty of thintine
  35. obermise. In his Book De Civ. D. He Con-
  36. ceives, ibat Origenick Opinion not Improba-
  37. ble, Tbat some Souls after Deach, and before the
  38. Resurrection, may Suffer from a certain Fire,
  39. for ibe consumine and burnine up of ebeir
  40. Oross: which cond not be without Bodies. 820,
  41. 822
  42. POInE. IS Therefore MOrC, IheN muIL every OnC
  43. OC chole Poines, cither Perccive a Point ol che
  44. Object, and no more, or else che Wholc. 11
  45. iheFormer, iben can nothine Perecive ibe I Bole,
  46. nor compare one Part of il with anoiber: Is ehe
  47. Laster, iben vould every man bave innumerable
  48. Percepeions of ihe mbole Object at onec.
  49. et
  50. Fourch Suppolicion. Thas ihc nhole Pxcendec
  51. Soul, Perccives both ihe Whole Object, and all
  52. the ParES ThCrCOF, (1O ParHOf this SOUI BAVIM
  53. any Perception by it Self) Not 1o le AIode
  54. Because, ihe Ir hole of an Lxtended Substance,
  55. norhine but AIrhe ParIS: and s0 is no Part have
  56. any Perception, ibe WV bole can Bave nOnC.
  57. Moreover, 20 fay, ihe W hole Soul Perceivet hall,
  58. and no Part of it any thine. is indeed to act no
  59. ledee it Unextended, and so have no Distane
  60. ParIS.
  61. 824, 820
  62. Aeain, This Philolopher vould prove ihe
  63. same ibine, fromthe Sempactiy or Hoimopachy.
  64. Which is in anima l5; it beine One andche Same
  65. chins, ibat perceives Pain in ibe Hlead, and in
  66. Fiherio seved, Fon the Ancient Asserrers ehe Poot; and Comprehends ibe rbole Bulk os
  67. of Unexrended IncorporcealIs, Ansivered all ihe ibe Body.
  68. Objections made acainst them: but especially ibat
  69. 120
  70. Lastly, He disputes furiber, from ihe Racio-
  71. of the Ilocalier and Immobiliey of Creaced In- naII Energies. A Magnicude coutd noc UN-
  72. CorporealIS; namely, Tbat by ibose Bodies,
  73. which ther are alvays Vically Uniced 10, ibey
  74. are Localired, and made Capable ot Mocion
  75. accordine 10 thatof Orisen, Zh0 Soul Rarids in
  76. necd oF a Body For Locall MOciONS. NCXL 10
  77. be considered, ibeir Reasons for ebis Assertion,
  78. of Unextended and Indistant Substance, se re-
  79. Puenant to Tmagination.
  80. 822
  81. at whatsoever Lreuments do Lvince orber
  82. Substance besides Body, ihe Same acainst the
  83. Acheilts Demonstrate, that there is Somethine
  84. Unextended; themselves takine it for granted.
  85. that robat soever is LXet s BO. Never-
  86. deritand, wbst bath no Magnicude, and rwbst
  87. is Indiritible: mbereas ve bave a Nocion, nOB
  88. onety of Lacitude Indivilible as 10 Tbictness
  89. and of Consicude as 1o Breadib, but also of a
  90. Machematicall Point, every may Indivisible.
  91. WVe have Nocions ofrbines also, ihut bave nei-
  92. iber Magnicude nor Site, ec. Acain, all 1he
  93. abstract Essences of thines Indivisible. WC
  94. conceive Excended chines themselves, Unex-
  95. cendediy; ihe Thonehtos a Mile, or a Thousand
  96. Miles Diltance, tatins up no more room in ibc
  97. Soul, ihen the Thoneh of an Inch, or of a Ma-
  98. chematicall PoInE. Moreover, vere thatmbich
  99. iheless oher dreumenis propounded By these perceiverh in us, a Magnicude, il conld not be
  100. incients, 1o prove direcity. Unextended Sub-
  101. NaHCC. PlOtinUS BiS FMI. LdPod iheHumane
  102. Dout and Mind such. FMBe Cocry Part of an
  103. Excended Soul is Soul; anas Mind, Mind.
  104. NOC. IF ihC L ater. Lhat HOFare Ot a SOUI,
  105. er Mind, is by ic SelFSoul, or Mind; Ihen Can-
  106. Lquall co every sensible, and atike Perceive
  107. thines Greater and Lesser, then it self. 827
  108. 828
  109. Besides wbich they miehe Argue rbus; That we,
  110. as ve ean Conceide Fxcension without COBit2.
  111. tion, and arain Cogication withont Rxcention.
  112. aaribe Wtiole, made up of all chose PArIS, be CFrem whence heir Diltinction aud Separabilis

Cite

A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. - . Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0179?run=74