A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. -
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- Lhe Contents.
- Sense restored. Svident ehat Orisen distin- Tuch. But is eveeY SuPPOTed Part OF a SOUI,
- Enisteth, ibe Ed Z. cur in S. PauI, (Transtated, be Soul, and oE a Mind, Mind; iben vould
- Pabernacle,) fromthe Farchiy Houle; heun-
- derstandine bythe former, a Thin Spiricuous B0.
- dV. which is a Midale betwixs the Larchly and
- ihe Deavenir and obich ihe Soul remaineth still
- all buc One be Supercuous; or Rvery Onc be
- che Whole: wbich oannot be in Excended
- chinss.
- PaBC822, 829
- Acain, Plocinus endeavours to Prove, from
- elorbed wiih, after Deach. This Opinion of ihe Energies of iheSoul, ibat itis unexcended
- Orivens, That the Soul ascer Deach, not quite Because it is One and ihe Same Indivisible chine.
- deparate from al BOdY, never reckoned ux in that Perecivethihe mhole Sentible Object. Ibis
- ihc Catalogue oF his RrrOUTS. Orig en not further pursued; IF ihe Soul be Fxcended, then
- Taxed by Methodius, for asserrine Souls 10) must it either be One Phy licalIPOInE, or MOre.
- Have Bodies, but for not assertins ihem 10 BC Impossible Thet it sould be buc One PhylicaII
- Bodies; ihere beine no truly lncorporealI Sub-
- stance, accordine eo Mechodius. but ihe Deiey.
- This One of ihe Fxtreams mentioned. And ih0
- Origenicke Hypothelis, 1o be preferred before
- that of Mechodius.
- Page 817, 820
- Alreadu Observed, That Origen not Sineu.
- tar, in ihis Opinion concerninq Hlumane SouIS;
- Trenaus, Philoponus. Joannes Thessaloni-
- centis, PTellus and orbers, asserrine the same.
- S. Auttine in his De Gen. ad LIC. Grantetb.
- That Souls alter Deach eannot be carried 10 any
- CorporalI Places, nor L Ocally Moved, without
- aBodr. Himself seems eo tbink ihc Punist-
- ment of SoulS, before the Resurrection, 10 be
- PhrancasticaII. But sives Liberty of thintine
- obermise. In his Book De Civ. D. He Con-
- ceives, ibat Origenick Opinion not Improba-
- ble, Tbat some Souls after Deach, and before the
- Resurrection, may Suffer from a certain Fire,
- for ibe consumine and burnine up of ebeir
- Oross: which cond not be without Bodies. 820,
- 822
- POInE. IS Therefore MOrC, IheN muIL every OnC
- OC chole Poines, cither Perccive a Point ol che
- Object, and no more, or else che Wholc. 11
- iheFormer, iben can nothine Perecive ibe I Bole,
- nor compare one Part of il with anoiber: Is ehe
- Laster, iben vould every man bave innumerable
- Percepeions of ihe mbole Object at onec.
- et
- Fourch Suppolicion. Thas ihc nhole Pxcendec
- Soul, Perccives both ihe Whole Object, and all
- the ParES ThCrCOF, (1O ParHOf this SOUI BAVIM
- any Perception by it Self) Not 1o le AIode
- Because, ihe Ir hole of an Lxtended Substance,
- norhine but AIrhe ParIS: and s0 is no Part have
- any Perception, ibe WV bole can Bave nOnC.
- Moreover, 20 fay, ihe W hole Soul Perceivet hall,
- and no Part of it any thine. is indeed to act no
- ledee it Unextended, and so have no Distane
- ParIS.
- 824, 820
- Aeain, This Philolopher vould prove ihe
- same ibine, fromthe Sempactiy or Hoimopachy.
- Which is in anima l5; it beine One andche Same
- chins, ibat perceives Pain in ibe Hlead, and in
- Fiherio seved, Fon the Ancient Asserrers ehe Poot; and Comprehends ibe rbole Bulk os
- of Unexrended IncorporcealIs, Ansivered all ihe ibe Body.
- Objections made acainst them: but especially ibat
- 120
- Lastly, He disputes furiber, from ihe Racio-
- of the Ilocalier and Immobiliey of Creaced In- naII Energies. A Magnicude coutd noc UN-
- CorporealIS; namely, Tbat by ibose Bodies,
- which ther are alvays Vically Uniced 10, ibey
- are Localired, and made Capable ot Mocion
- accordine 10 thatof Orisen, Zh0 Soul Rarids in
- necd oF a Body For Locall MOciONS. NCXL 10
- be considered, ibeir Reasons for ebis Assertion,
- of Unextended and Indistant Substance, se re-
- Puenant to Tmagination.
- 822
- at whatsoever Lreuments do Lvince orber
- Substance besides Body, ihe Same acainst the
- Acheilts Demonstrate, that there is Somethine
- Unextended; themselves takine it for granted.
- that robat soever is LXet s BO. Never-
- deritand, wbst bath no Magnicude, and rwbst
- is Indiritible: mbereas ve bave a Nocion, nOB
- onety of Lacitude Indivilible as 10 Tbictness
- and of Consicude as 1o Breadib, but also of a
- Machematicall Point, every may Indivisible.
- WVe have Nocions ofrbines also, ihut bave nei-
- iber Magnicude nor Site, ec. Acain, all 1he
- abstract Essences of thines Indivisible. WC
- conceive Excended chines themselves, Unex-
- cendediy; ihe Thonehtos a Mile, or a Thousand
- Miles Diltance, tatins up no more room in ibc
- Soul, ihen the Thoneh of an Inch, or of a Ma-
- chematicall PoInE. Moreover, vere thatmbich
- iheless oher dreumenis propounded By these perceiverh in us, a Magnicude, il conld not be
- incients, 1o prove direcity. Unextended Sub-
- NaHCC. PlOtinUS BiS FMI. LdPod iheHumane
- Dout and Mind such. FMBe Cocry Part of an
- Excended Soul is Soul; anas Mind, Mind.
- NOC. IF ihC L ater. Lhat HOFare Ot a SOUI,
- er Mind, is by ic SelFSoul, or Mind; Ihen Can-
- Lquall co every sensible, and atike Perceive
- thines Greater and Lesser, then it self. 827
- 828
- Besides wbich they miehe Argue rbus; That we,
- as ve ean Conceide Fxcension without COBit2.
- tion, and arain Cogication withont Rxcention.
- aaribe Wtiole, made up of all chose PArIS, be CFrem whence heir Diltinction aud Separabilis
Cite
A Discourse Concerning the True Notion Of The Lord's Supper, fol. - . Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/1066511403:0179?run=74