A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. VI
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.93.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- P. 13.
- Tbe P R F F AC F.
- becun between tuo learned Divines of our
- Church, about the second and fourth; and
- the acconnt Whuch our Vnitarians sive of
- both is this, That che one isa rational and
- intellisible Explication, but nOt true nOr
- Orthodox; the ocher is true and Ortho.
- dox, buc neither rational, intellisible nor
- Postible. I do not mention this, as thouch
- their vords ivere to be taken as to either;
- but onty to sew ihat advantace ther take
- from both. to represent that which is set
- up for the Churches Doctrine, either not +0
- he truly (0, or to be neither rational nOr
- intellisible.
- The detion of the follovine Discourle, is
- tomate it appear, (T.) That the Churches
- Doctrine, as tothe Trinity, as it is expr es-
- sed inthe Achanalian Creed, is not liable
- eo their charees of Contradiction, Impol
- sibilities and pure Nonsense. (2.) That
- ve oon no other Doctrine than Wvhat hath
- been recerved br the Christian Church in
- the severat Aces from the Apostles Times:
- (3.) And that there are no Objections in
- point of reason, Which ouche to hinder our
- assent to this great point of the Christian
- Fairh.
- But the chief Delion of this Pretace, is
- 20 remove this Prejudice Which lies in, our
- vay fromthe different manners of Explica.
- LiOr
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. VI. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0012?run=74