A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXIV
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.94.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- The D R F E AC F.
- and erroneous Explications of Articles of
- Faith, as any one may find that loots into
- them. And even the Inquisitors of Herelie
- themselves allou the distinction between
- Heretie and an erroneous Proposition in
- Faith, Which amounts to the same with a
- mistaten Explication of it; and they alt
- erant that there may be Propositions that
- tend to FTeresie or savour of it, Which can-
- not be condemned for TTeretical. And even
- na condemns Melchior Canus for be-
- 2I. quaest. 2. 8 +00 crue in alsertins it to be Flereste
- P. 226. To contradict the renerat Sense of Divines,
- because the Schools cannot make Here(eS.
- 2. It is frequently and solemnty affirmed
- mdestexa- by him, Thac the Onity olthe Ciodhead is
- the most real, essential, indivilible, insepa-
- rable Vnity; chacchere is bucone divine
- Nacure, Which is originally in the Facher,
- and is subltantial communicaced by
- . 27, 28. the Father to chie Son, a5 a diltinet (ub.
- Cltins Perlon, by an ccernal inettable
- Generation, and ro che Holy Cholt Dy
- an eternal and substantial Procestion trom
- Father and Son. Do the others who main-
- tain a Trinity deny this: By no means. For
- we have already seen that they assert the
- lame thins. So that they are fully aereed
- as to the main fundamenial Article. And
- even the DmIarIanS Meld, that from the
- beginnme
- Direct. In. PC
- quisit. part.
- min P. 19.
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXIV. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0030?run=74