A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXIII
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.93.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- The PR F F A CF.
- Son: Tea, suppose some spicefult Adversary
- Bould Cay, That et is a Contradiction 10
- Cay. That the same common Nature canmake
- a Per son oith a Mode superadded 20 it, unte(s
- that be individuared. for a Per (on doth im-
- ply an individuat Nature, and not a mere
- relative Mode. Is this sufficient to charee
- such a Person with the Sabellian Herely.
- Wwhich he ueterly disoons: I5 not thelike F-
- quitytobe seu d in another thouch different
- Explication: Suppose then a Per son solemn-
- ly prosesses to oon the fundament al Doctrine
- ofthe Trinitr as much as any oibers; but
- hethints, that three Persons must have di-
- stinct Substances to make them Persons, but
- S0 as to make no Division or Separation in
- the Codhead, and that he cannoi conceive a
- Communication of the divine Fssence with-
- out this; must this presentlr be run doon as
- Hlerele, When he asserts at the same time
- three persons in the same undivided Fs
- sence: But this is said to be a Contradicti-
- On; so it vas in the other case and not al-
- lou d then, and vohy sould it be otherwise
- in this: Y speate not this to justisie such F.X-
- plications, but to Bew that there is a dif-
- ference between the Hlerelie of denyine an
- arricle, and a mistate in the Lxplication
- of it. Fven the createst TTerese-makers
- in the worid, distinguist between Lleresies
- aMC
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXIII. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0029?run=74