A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXX
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.93.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- The DR F F AC F.
- sible Substance, for every Perton must have
- a proper Substance of his oon; or else accor-
- dinq to this AyDothe(is, he can be no Per-
- son; and this peculiar substance must be
- really distinct from that Substance Which is
- inthe otiser tvo: So that here muse be three
- distinet Substances in the three Persons.
- Dui hou then can there be but one individu-
- at Pssence in al three: We may conceive
- one common PPence to be individuated in
- three Persons, as it is in Men; but it 15
- impossible to concerve the same individual
- Pssence to be in three Persons, Which have
- peculiar Substances of their oun. Lor the
- Substances belonaine to the Persons, are tbe
- same Fssence individuated in those Persons:
- and so there isno avoidins makine three in
- dividuat Pssences and one specifick or com–
- mon divine Nature. And Maimonices
- his areument is considerable acainst more
- Ood5 thanone; IF, saith he, there DC LWVO
- Nore I Cods, there must De Comethine wrherein
- ther aerec, and Comethins iherein chey
- ditter; thac wrherein cher agrec must DC
- thac trhich makres cach ot them C0d.
- and char Wherein ther dister must make
- ehem two cods. Nou Wherein doth this
- disser from the present Hy PothesIS: There
- is somethine wherein they differ, and that
- is their proper Substance; but Maimonides
- thonohe
- VeClI, PaL.
- II. C. 1.
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXX. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0036?run=74