A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXIX
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.94.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- The PR F F ACF.
- But can one whole entire indivisible Sub-
- stance be actuallu divided into tbree Sub-
- stances: For if every Person must have a
- peculiar Substance of hisoin; and there be
- three Persons, there must be three peculiar
- Substances, and hon can there be three pe-
- culiar Substances, and yet but one entire
- and indivisible Substance: I do not Cay.
- there must be three divided Substances in
- place, or separate Substances, but theymust
- be divided as three Individuals of the
- same kind, which must introduce a Speci-
- Fck Divine Nacure, which I thint very in-
- consistent with the divine Perfections; but
- of this at laree inthe followins Discourse.
- do not lay any force upon this areument,
- that there can be no cround ot the Di. Fricheiim
- charsed, P.
- Rinction betireen the chree SubstanCeS, 16,
- if chere be but one Substance in the c0d-
- head, Cas some have done) because the
- Pame Substance cannot boch unite and
- distinonis them: for the cround of the
- distinction is not the Suostance but the
- Communication of il, and where that 15 P. 264.
- so freely asserted, there is a reason distinct
- fromthe Subctance it selt, Which makes the
- Distinction of Persens.
- But the difficuley. sil remains, how eact
- Person pould have a Substance of his oon:
- and vet there be but one entire and indivi-
- sible
- CXIX
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXIX. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0035?run=74