A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXXII
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.94.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- The PR F F A CF.
- ihe same indivisible Substance in the Father
- and the Son: But ther may contradict
- themselves. That is not impossible on ei-
- ther side. But doth it follon that they
- are cuilty of Teresie: Are not chree Sub.
- Hances and out one a Contradiction: No
- more, sar they, than that a communica-
- ted Substance is not distinct from that
- eohich did communicate. But this whole
- dispute we sind is at last resolved into the
- infinite and unconceivable Perfections of the
- Codhead, here it is most safely lodced:
- and that there is no real Contradiction
- in the Doctrine it sels, is part of the de
- sien ofthe Discourse afterwards.
- But here it will be necessary to take no-
- rice of what the Onicarians have objectect
- Considerat. abainst this new Explication, viz. TBaE
- plication of Was condemned by the ancients in the
- chetrinis cerion ot Philoponus; in thie midale A-
- Ec. P. 12. Ses, in che Perlon and Writings OF Abb0t
- Foachim; butmore severelr lince ihe Re-
- tormation, in ehe Perton ot Valentinus
- Gentilis, Who ras condemned at Geneva,
- and beheaded at Bern For this verr D0.
- etrine.
- T0 these Y Palt cive a distinct, ansiver:
- T. 45 +0 Foh. Philoxonus, L do freely
- oon, that in the Greele Churet, when in
- the sixth Century he broached his opinion,
- Tha
- on the Ex-
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXXII. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0038?run=74