A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXXIII
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.94.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- The DR F F AC F.
- That everr IIVpollaliS must have the
- common Nacure individuaced in it, this
- vas loote d upon as a Doctrine of dancerous
- consequence, both with respect to the Trini-
- Fy and Incarnation. The latter was the first
- occasion of it; for as LCOntius observes, Leont. de
- the dispute did not beginabout the Triniey, Sectis
- hue about the Incarnation; and Philovonus
- took part with those woho asserted but one
- Nature in Christ after the Vnion, and he
- vent upon this round, That if there vere
- tvo Natures there must be tuo Hypoltales,
- Because Nature and HIyDOctalIS ivere the
- same. Then those on the Churches side,
- saithLeontius, objected, That if thervere
- the same, there must be three distinet Na-
- tures in the Trinitr, as there vere three
- HIypostales; which Philoponus vielded,
- and grounded himself on Arittocles Do-
- etrine, that there vas but one common Sub
- stance and severat individuat Substances,
- and se held it vas in the Trinity, Whence he
- vas called the leader of the Herelie of the
- Triheils. This is the account siven by
- Leontius who lived very rear his time, A.
- D. 620. The same is affirmed of him by
- ACT. 5.
- Nicephorus, and that he vroie a Book on Niceph.
- purpose about the Vnion of tuvo Natures in Caltist. l.
- Christ, ont of which he produces his onn
- vords concernins a common and individual
- Nature
- 18. 6. 46,47.
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XXXIII. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0039?run=74