A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XLII
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.94.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- The DR E F AC F.
- and indivilible Onity of the Codhead; but
- withal, believe tbat every Per son hathan in-
- dividual Substance as a Person, and that Sa-
- bellianilm cannot be avoided othervise.
- Wherein Tthink theyare mistalen, and that
- the Fathers ivere of another opinion; and
- that our Church oons but one Substance in
- che Grdhead, as the Western Church al-
- vays did, (Which made such difficultr about
- receivine chree Hyvoctales, because they
- rook Hyvostalis for a Subctance) but vet L
- sec no reason why those Who assert three Hy
- Dostales, and mean threc individual Sub-
- stances sould be charced vith the FTeresie
- of Valentinus Centilis, or so much as with
- that of Abbar Joachim or Philovonus, be-
- cause they al rejected the individual Vniey
- ot the divine Nature, Which is constantly
- maintained by the Desenders of the other
- HyDOthelIS.
- But it is said and urge d vith vehemency,
- that these tuo thines are inconsistent witb
- each other; that it is coinque forvard and
- backvard, beine Orthodox in one Breath
- and othervise in the next; that al this
- loots like sussline and concealine the true
- meanine, and actine the old artifces un-
- der a different F’orm. For the Samolate
- nians and ArIanS, When ther vere pinched,
- scem d very Orthodox in their Expressions,
- but
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. XLII. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0048?run=74