Search the Nachlass

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 16

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. A Vindication of
  2. T. That cher evere a dictinet, separate
  3. Body of men from the Chriltiain Church.
  4. For all the ancient Writers Wvho (peak of
  5. eliem, do mention them as Fereticks, and
  6. Wholly divided trom it, as appears by
  7. Trenaeus, Tertullian, Epiphanius, Theodo-
  8. ret, 5. Aurultin, and others. Pusebius
  9. Euseb. 1. 3. Paich oF them, That althouch the Devil
  10. could not make them renounce Christianity.
  11. vet findins their weabne (S, EoDEFL C70, HC
  12. made them his oon. Hc would never
  13. have Caid this of ans irhom helooled on
  14. a5 Members oF the Chrictian Church. BuF
  15. avherein is it chat Pusebius blames them:
  16. HIO cells it in the very next words; thac
  17. it Wa5 for the mean opinion they entertained
  18. of Christ; For they loole d on him asa meer
  19. Man, but very just. And althoush there
  20. vere tuvo sorts ol chem; lome vrrnins
  21. the miraculous Conception, and Others nOL;
  22. vet Paith he, They at last acreed in the
  23. same Impiety, Wvhrich W a5, Fhat they vould
  24. not oon Christ tohave had any Pre. existence
  25. hefore his Birth; nor that he vas dede
  26. 16705, Cod the Word. IS true, he Ands
  27. Tault ith ehem alcerwards for keepine t0
  28. the LaW of Moles; Dut the tirct Impietr
  29. he charges ehem with, is the ocher. That
  30. rhich l’interr trom hence 15, that Puse-
  31. bius himsele (eo irhom thes protess to
  32. Aen

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 16. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0088?run=74