Search the Nachlass

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 23

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.92.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. the Doctrine of the Frinier.
  2. Predecesors, we ouchero have a partieu-
  3. lar ere co the rule of Faith received by
  4. them, wrhich must be verr ditterent trom
  5. ours, il they Follo the Fbionites, a5 I
  6. doube noc to matre it appear. They Cay,
  7. The Fbionites used onty S. Marthew5 60. ansiver ra
  8. Dr. BUII
  9. spet. But the Christian Church then, and p. 42.
  10. ever Cince, have receir dche Tour Golpels,
  11. as of divine authoritr. Eusebius, onc ot
  12. the most approved Auchors in Antiquier
  13. by our Tnitarians, reckeons up the four
  14. Evancelists and S. Pauls Fpistles, a5 rri-
  15. cines univertally received by the Christi-
  16. an Church; then he mentions lome se
  17. nerally rejected as spurious; and atrer
  18. those wtrich vere doubted, amons rhich
  19. he mentions the Gospel accordine to the
  20. FLebrews, Which the Zevist Christians fol-
  21. lowd. Nor here is an apparent difference
  22. Dut betreen the Cospel accordine 10 the
  23. FTebrews, and S. Macthews 6ospel; 25
  24. much as between a Book receird with.
  25. ont controvertie, and one that ras nOL.
  26. But iE the Cospel accordine to the Tlebrews
  27. vere then achnomledscd to De the true
  28. Cospet ofS. Matthew; ic was impossible a
  29. man ot (o much sense aS Fusebius, Mousd
  30. malse this difference betreen them. BUE
  31. it is worth our observine, irtrat our 2ni-
  32. tarians Cay about this macter. And by
  33. that

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 23. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0095?run=74