Leibniz Legible

Machine transcription of the Leibniz Nachlass

Search the Nachlass

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 62

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.93.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. A Vindication of
  2. Father is 60d, the Son is Cod the TToly
  3. Chost is 60d; the Father is not the Son,
  4. nor the Son the Pather, nor the LTolr Chost
  5. either Father or Son. And RC GOCS OM.
  6. Prinitas Onus Deus,
  7. The Trinityis one God one Fter-
  8. Frinitas una Aterhitas, nity, one Pover, one Majesty.
  9. una Porestas, una Maje-
  10. StaS, tres Perlonx sed
  11. non tres Dii.
  12. Three Persons oneGod. Soit is in
  13. Frasmus his Fdition; but chC
  14. late Edicors Pay, thatthe mord
  15. Personae laas noc in their Manuscripe.
  16. And it is noc material in this Place, Aince
  17. elsentiere he approves the ule ofthe word
  18. Non dudeisus dicere
  19. Persons, 25 the AEtCA FO exPrCIS
  20. unam Essentiameres Sub- our meanino in this Calc. For
  21. ctancias, sed unam Essen
  22. tiam vel Substanciam,
  23. since some Word must be acreed
  24. eres autem Pertonas, upon, te declare our Sense by, he
  25. quemadmodum multi
  26. Catini ista tractantes d
  27. digni auctoritare dixe-
  28. Paith, those who understood the
  29. Propriety of the Latin toncue
  30. runc, cum alium mo- could not pitch upon any more
  31. dum apciorem non in-
  32. venirent, quo enuncia-
  33. proper than that, 10 sienisce that
  34. rene verbis, quod sine they did not mean three distinct
  35. verbis incellisebanE. Aug.
  36. Trinio. l. 5. c. 8.
  37. Fsences, but the same Fssence
  38. virh a different Erpostasis
  39. founde d in the Relation of one t0 the other.
  40. as Father and son have the Came Divine
  41. Fssence, but the Relations beine se different
  42. that one eannot be confounded withthe other,
  43. that wohich results from the Relation beine
  44. joyned with the Fssence, was it which vas
  45. called a Person.

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 62. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0134?run=74