A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 76
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- AVindication of
- T. Thac there is no Person Where there
- isnointelligent Nature tomakre it a Perion,
- and (o ve orant ic. 2 Thac a Person implies
- an intelligent Being, separate and divided
- Trom ocher Individuals of the Pame Kind,
- aS IEis amones men: and (o e deny it 25
- 1o thePerions oftheTrinier, because the
- Divine Fssence is not capable ot such Di-
- vition and Separation as thehumane Na-
- TUrC 15.
- But lay they again, The Fathers did
- hold a specisicat Divine Nature, and the
- Per(ons to be as fo many individuals. This
- ther repeat very olten in their late Books;
- and alter all, reter us to Curcellaeus For
- undeniable Proofs oF It. Let us For the pre-
- LaMtoch. Sent suppole ic, then Thope the Fathers
- are frecd trom holdine contradictions in
- the Doctrine ol the Trinur; For Wwtrac
- Lerter to Contradiction can it be, to hold threc in-
- dividual Persons in che Ciodhead, and Onc
- common Nacure, nore than it is to hold
- that there are chrec hurmane Perlons in One
- and the same common Nature ot Man:
- Wiil cher matre this a Contradiction to0:
- But lome have (0 uled themselves to the
- Languase ot Fareon,. Nonsense, Contradi-
- ction, Impossibility, that it comestromthem,
- as lome men livear, Whien cher do noc
- lino it. Buc Lam not illins t0 80oA
- wic
- ansiver et
- Euplic.
- the
- verse
- On
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 76. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0148?run=74