Leibniz Legible

Machine transcription of the Leibniz Nachlass

Search the Nachlass

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 75

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.85.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. OnE
  2. VI
  3. ide
  4. intes
  5. 100
  6. pied
  7. di
  8. sons
  9. O1
  10. d
  11. the Doctrine of the Frinicy.
  12. will noc this overthrou the distinction of
  13. Persons and run us into Sabellianism: By
  14. no means. For our Onitarians erant,
  15. That the Noetians and Sabellians held, that Discourse
  16. concernins
  17. there is but one divine Substance, PPence the nomi
  18. or Nature, and but one Person. Andhou nal and re-
  19. can thole wrtro hold three Persons be Sa-al Trinita-
  20. p
  21. bellians: Tes, Pay they, the Sabellians
  22. helathree relative Persons. But did ther
  23. mean three distinet Subsistences, or onty
  24. one Sublictence lultamine the Names, Or
  25. Appearances, or Maniteltations of threc
  26. riau e
  27. Perlons: The larter they cannot deny to
  28. hare been the rrue sense ot the Sabellians.
  29. Buc Cay chez, these are three Persons in a
  30. classical criticat Sense. We medole not ae
  31. prelent ith the Dilpute which Vallahath
  32. asaint Boethius about the proper Latin Pecar. de
  33. Trinit. l.
  34. Sense ot a Person (and Petavius Caith V al. g. c. g.
  35. las Objections are mere Fests and Tristes)
  36. Dut our Sense of a Person i5 plain, chat it
  37. Tignitiesthe Fsence With a particular man-
  38. ner ot Subsictence, wrhrich che Circeke Fa
  39. thers called an Teypostasis, takcins it For
  40. that incommunicable Properey wtrich
  41. makes a P erson.
  42. But Cay our Enitarians, a Perion IS an Defence of
  43. intelligent Beine, and therefore three Per- the History
  44. of theV.
  45. sons must be three intellisent Beinss. Ian. nic. p. 5.
  46. LWer, Chat This MaY BCLALCM ENO WayS.
  47. c. ThaI

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 75. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0147?run=74