A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 81
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.80.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- D0
- Ch 6
- lube
- Bi
- Se
- I
- di
- IE.
- PE
- II
- iC
- itt
- ade
- the Doctrine of the Friniey.
- ced oF thole matters denied, that a Spe-
- cisick Nature vas divided, when there
- vere several indiriduals under ic. BuE
- Wrhrat is it ertrich makres the vnion indisso-
- Tuble: IS it the 2nity OF thC PsenCCOP
- nOt: IF it be, is it the Pame individual
- Essence, Or noc: IF the lame individual
- Essence matres the inseparable Vnion,
- What is ic, Which malres the difterence et
- individuals: IF it be Paid, The incommu-
- nicable Properties of the Persons; Imust
- AiIl aste ho Pueh Properries in che Came
- indiridual Fssenco. can make ditterent in-
- dividuals: IF it be Caid eo be the same Spe-
- cifick Nature; then ho comesthacwhich
- is in it selF capable oF Division Fomake an
- indissoluble Dnion:
- BuF Caith Curcellaeus, Athanalius makes CurcclI.
- Christ to be of the same Substance as AdAMI,
- and Seth, and Abraham, and IPaSC are said
- +0 be Con. substantiat oith each otber. And
- What FoIlons: That the Pather and Son
- are divided from each other, as they vere?
- This is noc possible to behis Sense; con-
- Ciderins wrhac he Paith ot the Indivisibi-
- lier ot theDivine Nature. And Athana-
- sius himsele hach given sufficient Warnins
- B. 82.
- ActanaL.
- de Syned.
- axainst Tuch a Mis construction ot hiS Arim et
- Nords; and Ctill urses that our Concepti- Seluc. P.
- ons ouche to be suitable to the Divine Na- 928.
- ture.
- 916, 920,
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 81. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0153?run=74