A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 82
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.88.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- 2.9.9.
- CurcelI.
- 28. 64.
- Mtaam.
- 384
- C HrCeH.
- dect. 73.
- A Vindication of
- ture, not taken from what we sec amonq men.
- And ic is observable, that wrhen Paulus
- Samosatenus had uroed ehis as the Best Ar-
- sument asainst the term Ouosor , That
- it made such a difference of Substances as is
- amone men: for that Realon Caith Athana-
- sius, his fudces vere content to let it alone, for
- the Son of God is not in such a sense Con-sub-
- stantial; but afterwards. theWicene Fathers
- findine out tbe Art of Paulus, and the sienisi-
- cancy of theWVord ro discriminate the AriaNS,
- made use of it, and ouly thoueht it necessary
- to declare, that when it is applied to God,
- Et is not to be understood, as amone indivi-
- duat Men.
- A5 to the Dialogues under Athanasius
- his Name, on Which Curcellaeus insills (0
- much; it is now verr well knoon chat
- ther belons noctohim, bueco Maximus;
- andby comparins ehem withi otler places
- in him, iE may appear, thar he intended
- no specisick Nature in 60d.
- Buc laich Curcellaeus, Is the Fathers in
- tended any more than a Specifick Nature,
- Why did they not use WVords Which vould ex-
- press it more fullr, ASMoroSO O and -
- 205 lor that very Realon, Which he
- iventions trom Spiphanius, because they
- vould seem to approach t00 near to Sabellia-
- nism.
- 3. Ba)1
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 82. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0154?run=74