A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 84
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- A Vindication os
- vant ofthis, some assere but one ypostasis
- as wellas one Fssence; and orhers, because
- there are three Erpostases, suppose there
- are three distinet Esences. For both vent
- upon che lame Ciround, chat Fypostasis
- and Essence vere chc Pame. Theretore
- Paith he, those wrhro heldthree Tpostases,
- did male rir rr Souor diclecon a Division
- of substances. Erom Whence it TolIOWS
- chat S. Basit did loolc upon the Nocion ot
- three distinet. Substances a5 a miltale: 1
- Cay distinct Substances, 25 Individuals arc
- distinet; For Corhe tirst Principles oF Phi-
- loloptiy do onn chat individuals makre a
- Liceiecors, ex Division of the Species into
- several and dictinet Individuals.
- Bat doth not S. Ba(Il e0 about 10 ex-
- plain his Notion by the common Nature os
- man, and the several Individuals under it 3
- and what can this senisie to his purpose
- untess he allous the same in the Godhead:
- lgrant lie doth (0, but he Caichthe sub-
- stance, 15 char wrhich is common to the
- Whole kind; the sypostasis is that wrhich
- proverly distinsuitherh one Individual
- from another; Wtrich he calls the rd ide-
- or che reculiar incommunicable Proper-
- .Which he deleribes by a Concourse of
- erass distenuistins Characters in every Indivi-
- sicopa Icv. dual Dut how dorh heapply chele thines
- Covdce
- n ZCV 31E
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 84. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0156?run=74