A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 87
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.82.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- anc
- Vh
- Ca
- asit 5
- 18
- a
- the
- Ma
- MIIII
- bei
- the Doctrine of the Friniey.
- Nature, or divine Properties; Whrereas
- he is (0 lar trom sivins Tuch an anliver,
- that he absolurelr denies chat there can
- be more Ciods than one in that verv
- place. He mentions it a5 an Objecti-
- on, that lince he Caid, That the l’ather
- is 60d, the Son Cod, the TToly Chost
- C0d; he must hold three Gods; co Wtrich
- he anliers, We oun, but one God, not in
- Number, but in Nature: Then Cay they,
- TLe held but one G0d in Nature and more
- in Number. Thac is (0 Far From his mean-
- inS, thac Phardr chinke ans chat read the
- Pastase in S. Basil, could (o wiltuly per-
- vere his meanine. Forhis intention WaS
- (0 Far trom assertins more Gods in Number,
- that it vas to prove (o perfect a Onity
- in Cod, that he wasnor capable ot num-
- ber, or oE beins more than onc. FOr,
- Caith he, That Wwhich is said to be one in
- Number, is not realty and simply one, but
- is made up of many, Which by composition
- become one; a5 ve Cay, the worid is one
- vhich is made ux of many thines. But Cod
- is a simple uncompounded Beine; and there-
- fore cannot be said to be one in Tumber. But
- therorid is not one by Nature, because it is
- made up of se many thines, but it is one by
- Number, as those severat parts make but
- one Worid. Is noc chis fair dealine ich
- Fuch a Nan a5 S. Basil, eo reprelene his
- d
- Set
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 87. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0159?run=74