A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 88
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.88.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- AVindication os
- Sense quite othervise than it i5 : AS
- choueh he allor d more Gods than one in
- Number. Number, Caich he again, be-
- lones to Duantity, and Ouantity to Bodies,
- but rohat relation have these toGod, but
- n se Mo- asheis the Maker of them: Number belones
- vas ni F. +o materiat and circumscribed Beines; but,
- vas ns a-
- rans ni a laith he, the most perfect 2nity is to becon-
- menuns cerved in the most simple and incomprehen-
- Voia5 671
- nuarri Sible FSence. Where it is observable, char
- xor. BasiI. he ules thole Words Which are allod
- P. II. P. 10 expressthe most perteet and lingular
- 926.
- Petar. de VniEy. Which Petavius himsele contel-
- Frinic L. Petli, thac they can never be under Atood of
- + bi fbit
- a specisicke Nature: arid Curcellaeus Can
- not deny, That uovos beine added 10 FIG
- dothrestrain the Sense more to a numericat
- Qnity, aShe calls it. Ho then is it pol-
- sible to understand S. Basit oF more Oods
- than one in number: And in the very lame
- Pagehe mentions the 2aUZO2nS ZuS DVOEOS,
- the Sameness of the divine Nature, by
- Whichthe oucsoior isbetrer understood.
- r. B. 106. But Curcellaeus ill have no morethan
- a Specifick nity understood. Belore he
- Paid, that aurosos vould have sienised
- more, but nor he finds it uled, the calo
- 15 alter d: S0 that the Fathers could nOt
- mean any ocher than a specifick Dnitr.
- ler chem ule what exprestions chey pleaSd.
- 3
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 88. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0160?run=74