A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 92
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.89.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- A Vindication of
- Individuals, (0 che particular Fsence in
- cach ot themis divided From therest. And
- (0 Philoponus took FTypostasis FOr an Ps
- J. 18. c. 17. Sence individuated by peculiar Properties:
- and theretore alserted, thac Where ever
- chere Was an FEypostasis, there must bc2
- dictinet Fssence; and trom hence he held
- the chree Persons eo have chrec dictinet
- LNenCCS.
- 3. We are no toconsider, hor tar
- Grecorr Nussen carried chis, Wrhecher he
- choughe it held equally a5. to the divine
- Fypostasis; and chat he did not, apPears
- to me trom thele aroumenes:
- L. IIe utterly denies any kind ot Divi-
- sion in the divine Nature: For in the con-
- clusion os that Dilcourse, he Caith, it is
- not onty araegnnaxzos (a Word otien
- used by the Grrecle Fachers on this occali
- on, trom wvhence Athanasius asainst Ma-
- Achan. L. dedomus interr d an Identity, and Caesari-
- IL. P. 280.
- Caetar.
- Us IO7nS 2O ZaVTOV 715 Soi_S X, 20 anaeg
- Duxest. 3. naxtor 2n5 Dcorn ; and (0 S. Basit
- P. 12.
- uses it) but he adds anocher Word, Wrhich
- i5 aedraiec , Indivilible. Tes, as alt Fs
- sences are indivisible in themselves; but
- they may be divided in their Subjects, as
- Grecorr Nyslen allons it t0 be in Men.
- Porant it, buc then he omns a Division et
- Tome kinc Wrhich he here absolutely de-
- nICS
- Nicept.
- Calist. hist.
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 92. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0164?run=74