Search the Nachlass

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 94

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.88.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. A Vindication of
  2. us; as he there Mes at large. Petavi-
  3. us Wras arvare oF this, and theretore he
  4. Paith, he quitted it and returned to the
  5. other; Whereas he onir Caith, If his Ad
  6. versaries be displeased with it, De thintes
  7. ihe other sufficient. Which in MOrE 15.
  8. that PHence in it selFis one and indivi(i.
  9. ble; but amons Men ic is dirided accor-
  10. dine eo the Subjects; that the divineNa-
  11. ture is capable ofno Divition at ail, and
  12. cheretore che difterence ot Lypostases must
  13. be tromthe difterent Relations and Man
  14. ner OF Subsistence.
  15. 3. TIC expresses his meonine fully in
  16. anocher place. For in his Catechetical O.
  17. GresNCration, he Caith, he looks on the Doctrine
  18. sen, Lom. of the Trinity as a profound Mystery (Wrhich
  19. d
  20. three individuat Persons in one speciscke
  21. Nature is Far From.) But Wvherein lies it:
  22. Chiear in this, That there Pould beNum-
  23. ber and no Number; different Vieu and yet
  24. but One; a distinction of Typostases, and
  25. vet no Division in the Subjects. For (0
  26. his Words arC, n, S puECt 2d 2OCI
  27. purvor; irhich is contrary ro wtrac he laid
  28. Ot human Fsypostases. NoW, Wtrat is tho
  29. Subject in chis cale: According 10 Cur-
  30. cellaus hisNotion, it must De an Indivi-
  31. dual. BBE Tince he altertS there CaM BCHO
  32. Division in the Subjects, then he mule
  33. Orecctro
  34. 8.

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 94. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0166?run=74