Search the Nachlass

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 102

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.92.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. A Vindication of
  2. Kickine, a5 for their Scuxidity. And is
  3. not this great skil in chele MaterS, 10
  4. makhe luch a Paralset betveen three Per-
  5. sons in the Godhead, and Peter, Tames
  6. and Zohn: Do ther chinke there is no dit-
  7. Terence betreen an intinitely pertect BC-
  8. ino, and such Ainire limired Creatures a5
  9. Individuals amone Men are: Do ther
  10. Suppole the divine Nacure capable of Cuck
  11. Division and Separation by IndividualS,
  12. es human Nature is. No, theranar lay,
  13. Bui je obo Bola three Persons must thinte
  14. so: For Whracreaton: Wo do ollert chree
  15. verlons, but it is on the accoune ot di-
  16. vine Revelation, and in such a manner,
  17. ad the divine Nacure is capable ofit. FOr
  18. it i5 a 800d rule oF Boethius, Talia sunt
  19. praedicata, qualia subjecta permiserint.
  20. We must not lay that chere are Pertons
  21. in the Trinier, but in such a manner as
  22. is dgrecable tothe divine Nature; and il
  23. thac be not capable ot Division and Sepa-
  24. rarion, elien the Pertons must De in the
  25. Tame undirided Fssence. ThC ReXE ArtI-
  26. ele is. Neicher contoundins the Persons,
  27. Bor dividine the Substance; But hou can
  28. ve, lay chey, not confound the Persons
  29. ehat have, as ve Cay, but one numerical
  30. Substance: And hou can we bui divide the
  31. Substance, Which ve find in three distinet di-
  32. videa

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 102. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0174?run=74