Search the Nachlass

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 104

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.93.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. A Vindication of
  2. AO Relation, but the Perton ot the Father
  3. Or oF the son mult; and chese Relations
  4. eannot be contounded wich onc another.
  5. And il the Facher cannot be che Son, nor
  6. ehe Son the Facher, then thes must bc
  7. distinet trom cach other. But hOW: By
  8. dividinque the Substance: Thac is impolsi-
  9. ble in a Substance chat is indivilible. Ic
  10. nay be Caid, That the Fssence of created
  11. Beines is indivisible, and vet there are di-
  12. vided Persons. I grant it, buc then a
  13. created Lsence is Capable of ditterent ac-
  14. cidents and qualities to divide one Per-
  15. son trom another, Which cannot be sup.
  16. poled in thedivine Nature; and withaiI
  17. che lame pover wrhich sires a Beins 10
  18. a creaced Esence, sives it a separate and
  19. divided Exictence trom aIl others. A5
  20. ertien Peter, Fames and John received
  21. their several dictinet Perlonalicies trom
  22. Crod; althe lame time he sare them their
  23. Separate Beinsstrom cachother, although
  24. the lame Fsence be in chem alI.
  25. But hou can ve but divide the Substance
  26. Wvhichve sec in three distinet divided Per-
  27. sons: The queltion is, Whecher the di
  28. Kinet Propercies of the Perlons doimply
  29. a Division et che Substance. We deny
  30. that the Persons are divided as tothe Sub-
  31. stance, becaule chac is impossible to be di-
  32. vided:
  33. 104

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 104. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0176?run=74