A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 105
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.92.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- A
- heie
- M
- the Doctrine of the Trinicy.
- vided; but re lay, ther are and must be
- distinsuished as to those incommunicable
- Proverties which malie the Pertons di
- Cinet. The essential Properties are unca-
- pable ot beine divided, andthe Relations
- cannot becontounded; (o thac there must
- De one undivided Substance and y et three
- distinet Perlons.
- But every Person must have his oon pro-
- per Substance: and so the Substance must be
- divided is tbere be three Persons. That
- every Perlon must have a Substance 10
- suppore his Sublictence is not deniec, but
- ehe queltion is, Whecher that substance
- must bedividedor not. Welar, Where the
- Subltance Will bear it, 25 in created BC.
- iB9S, a Person hach a separate subctance,
- i. e. the Tame Nature diversitied by AC
- cidents, ualities and a separate Lxiltence,
- but ihere chele chines cannot be, thereu
- the same Essence must remain undivided
- Dur wich such relative Properties a5 can
- not be contounded. But may not the same
- undivided Substance be communicated t0
- three divided Persons; so as that each Per-
- son may have his oon proper Substance, and
- vet the divine Psence be in it self undivi-
- ded: Thisisnotthe cale betore uS. FOr
- the queltion uxon the Crecd is, Whecher
- the Substanee can be dirided. And bero
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 105. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0177?run=74