A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 145
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.76.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- s0
- li
- OU
- 3iL
- 125,
- ense,
- es.
- dd
- the
- uib
- ni
- eel
- C0
- M
- the Doetrine of the Prinicy.
- And by this ve maj understand S. PC- NatC. 16
- ters Contestion, Thou art the Christ, the 5. Joh. 6.
- Son of the livine Cod; and Nathanael 5, 69. 1. 49.
- Thou art the Son of Cod. But it is plain
- the Feus in the Conference thoughe he
- made himsels Cod, by Cayine, Y and my F’a-
- ther are One. Not one Cod, Cay our Wrise
- 10. 533.
- Interpreters, but as Friends are said to be Hist. of
- Onc. And irtrat mult cher chinte of nicar. p. 29.
- our Saviour the mean time, wtio bnew
- ehe Teus underctood him quire otherwile,
- and vould noc undeceive them:
- But chez CaY, The Tens put amalicious ansver to
- Construction upon his Words. How doch Milb. P. 29.
- that appear: Do they chink the Fewshac
- not heard whrat passed betore in lometor-
- mer Conterences, ivhien thor chiouxhe he
- had madte him selE equal with Cod; and chat Foh. 5018.
- he Caid, That au men sould honour the Son,
- even as they honoured the Father?
- Thele Saringsno doubt Auck ichthems
- and theretore trom them, thes had Realori
- eo chink chac he meane lomethine extra-
- ordinary, by his Payins. I and my Father
- are One. And il they vere (0 Wise in in
- terpretine Scripture, asther pretend, eher
- vould have considerec, that il chele thingo
- did noc imply his beins reallr the Son ot
- Crod, accordins eo the old sowistr Nociors
- he ouldhave sererely cheched any sucte
- Psti
- 143
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 145. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0217?run=74