Search the Nachlass

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 146

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. a Vindication of
  2. Mis constructions ot his meaning, and
  3. have plainty cold etiem, he vas buc the
  4. Son of Man BuE S. Pauls Character ot
  5. him doch plainly Mrew, thac he was Far
  6. trom any chins lite Vanicy or Octenca-
  7. tion, Althouch he vas inthe form of God,
  8. and thouxhe it no Robberr to be equal oith
  9. Cod; Which must imply chac he was very
  10. car trom assumins any chins eo himselt;
  11. Wvhich he mustdo in avery hioh mealure.
  12. it he vere not really the son ot C0d, (0
  13. 45 10 De equat with 60d. The meanine
  14. Whereot, lay our Wise Interpreters, 15, he
  15. Hist. of V. did not rob Cod of his Tlonour by arroga-
  16. nicar. p. 38. ting to himself to be 60d, or equal with
  17. C0d. Bur What chen do ther chinte
  18. Ot thele pastases in his conferences with
  19. the Feus: Was he noc bound to unde.
  20. ceive them, wrhen he beneur chey did
  21. (0 grossly mis understand him, if he lenew
  22. himelF eo be ameer Man ac che Pame
  23. time: This can never g0 donn mith me,
  24. For they must cicher Charse him wich
  25. affectins Divine Honour, Wrtrich is the
  26. highest Deoree ot Pride and Vanity, Or
  27. ther must omnhim tobe, as he Was, The
  28. eternal Son of Cod.
  29. VI. IS this interpretine Scripture lite
  30. Wrise men, co deny Divine Worstip to be
  31. Diren to our Saviour wrhen the scripture
  32. Ptril. 2

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 146. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0218?run=74