Search the Nachlass

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 150

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.92.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. AVindication of
  2. prover divine Worchip. Geore. Blandrata
  3. ras unsatistied, thac Socinus did noc lay
  4. enovoh to prove the necesliey ot theln-
  5. vocation of Christ, Wtrich he Caid hecould
  6. dofrom his Priesthood and his Pover, from
  7. the Fxamples ofthe Apostles, and the very
  8. Nature of Adoration. And Blandrata WV25
  9. a Man of great authoriey amones the
  10. nitarians; and he thoushe Socinus oushe
  11. to alsere che necessity ot ic; or else he
  12. nould do injury both to Christ and to his
  13. Cause.
  14. In the dilpure wich Francken, Socinus
  15. vene uxon chis fround, thac divine Au
  16. thorier vas a sufficient oround for divine
  17. Worstip, althoush chere ivere not thole
  18. essential Attributes oF Omnisciener and
  19. Omnipotener. But I observe, chac Socinus
  20. did noc lool on this as a matter oF Liber-
  21. Cy, a5 our Enitarians now scem 10 do:
  22. For in the Pretace to the Former Dispute,
  23. he calls the firror oF denvins the Invoca
  24. tion of Christ, noc, asther now do, a
  25. simple Frror Or a mere mistake; but a most
  26. filitor and pernicious Frror, an Frror that
  27. leads to Fudaism, and is in effect the deny-
  28. ins of Christ; and in che latter Dispute
  29. he laith, That it tends to Fpicurism and
  30. Dedirin. Srheism. And Smalcius Caich, That they
  31. dre no Cbristians who refuse sivine divine
  32. Worstip to Christ.
  33. 2. 1
  34. Ctiralt1 6.

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 150. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0222?run=74