A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 168
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- AVindication of
- that Father, Son and TToly Ghest are one
- Cod and prove it by the Testimony of S.
- John. Tres sunt qui Testimonium perhi-
- bent in caelo, Pater, Verbum (5 Spiritus
- Sanctus, Co hiTres unum sunt.
- 3. In the former Testimony, the ou
- thoriey oF che Vulcar Latin was made
- usc of: and why, isit rejectedhere: When
- Morinus contelles there 15 no variety in
- Moritr. the Copies OEIc. Vulcata versio hunc ver-
- Cic Bib
- T. Ex. = sum constanter habet. Anc he observes,
- . 7. m. 9. thac chole oF the Farhers, Who seem 10
- Omit it (25 5. Aurustin asainA Maximi-
- nus) did not Follon ihc old Latin Ver(
- On. Lucas Brusensis, Laith Only. That in
- 35 old Copies, they found it vantine but in
- AvC. A.StOS. FeromS Prologue, Iam nOE
- concerned 10 detend it; but Frasmus
- thouche it had too much ofS. Terom in it,
- and others thinke it hath t00 litile. F. Si-
- Cricique mon contesses, that P. Pithaeus and Mabil-
- XL. 69
- Conthink it Wras S. Teroms, andthat it W a5
- in the MSS. Buc I conclude with Pay.
- ino, Thac erhroever wasthe Auclior, ac the
- time wtien it as irritten, the Greek Co-
- pies had this Verse, or else he Wras a nO.
- torious Impoltor.
- Z. The next thing P Mallaste chele wise
- Interpreters of Scripture, 15, Whecher,
- irtien ehe Scripture (o often aAirms, That
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 168. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0240?run=74