A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 196
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.92.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- A Vindication of
- nom Epread by some ac trst within the
- Communion ot it; a5it Wwas not only in
- the Case ot Noetus and Bervilus, Dut Ot Sa-
- bellius himselt, who made the greatest
- noile about this Doctrine; and his Disci-
- ples, Epiphanius tellsus, spread very much
- both in the Fastern and W’estern parts; in
- Melopotamia and at Rome. Their Do-
- etrine, he Caith, was, that Father, Son and
- TToly Ghost ivere but one TCypostasis, with
- three different Denominations. They com-
- pared God co the Sun, the F’ather 10 the
- Substance, the Son tothe Licht, and the TTo-
- Wy Ghost to the Fleat Which comes from it:
- andthele tro latter ivere onty distinct O.
- perations of the same Substance.
- Epiphanius thinks thac Sabellius therein
- ditterd trom Noetus, hecause he denied that
- the Father sufferd; bur S. ducustin can
- find no diflerence betveen them. AI
- that can be conceived is, that a ditterent
- Denomination did arise trom che diflerent
- appearance and Operation; Which our 2.
- nitarians call three Relative Persons, and
- scourseos one Subsistine Person.
- Sabellius did spread his Herelie most in
- nit. V. 1d. is ovn Connery; utuich Wvas in Penta-
- polis of the Crrenaick Province, beins born
- in Prolemais onc ot che tive Cities chere.
- DE chis Dionysius Bistop ol Alexandria
- sIvCS
- Exiph
- HaT. 62
- AVS. in
- Joh. Etacc
- 36
- Nominat.
- and reat
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 196. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0268?run=74