Search the Nachlass

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 195

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.92.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. the Doctrine of the Prinier.
  2. Buc althoueh Noetus vas condemnec
  3. Com
  4. enE.
  5. vet this Doctrine did spread inthe Faltern in Matct.
  6. Parts; For Orieen mentions thole Who con- P. 470.
  7. founded the Notion of Father and Son, and
  8. made them but one TEypostasis, and distin-
  9. suised onty by thoueht, and Denomination.
  10. This Doctrine was oppoled not onty by
  11. Oricen, but he had the sense ofthe Church
  12. concurrins with hum, a5 appears in thc
  13. Case ot Berrius Bilhop oF Bostra, Who feil
  14. into this Opinion, and ras reclaimed by
  15. Orizen; and Ensebius sives chis accoune
  16. OF it. That there vas a Concurrence of 0. Fuleb. l. 6.
  17. thers vith him in it, and chac this D0- 5. 33.
  18. ctrine Wras lookd on as an Innovation in
  19. the Faith. For his Opinion as that oux
  20. Saviour had no proper Subsistence of his oon
  21. before the Incarnation; and that the Deity
  22. of the Father alone vas in him. Hc did
  23. noc mean that the son had no separate Di
  24. vinier from cheFather, but thacthe Deitr
  25. OF the Facher only appeared in the Son;
  26. (0 chat he ras not really crod, but ontv
  27. onc in whom the Dciey ot the Pather
  28. vas made manifest. Which Was one of
  29. the oldest Herelies in the Church, and the
  30. most carty condemned and opvoled by
  31. to
  32. But chole Herekes, Which betore hac
  33. disterenced Perlons tromthe Church, Were
  34. nOv

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 195. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0267?run=74