A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 200
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.88.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- A Vindication of
- underctand three distinct TIrpostases, but
- not divided; tor that appears to have
- been the Sabellians Arsument, That if
- there vere three, ther must be divided:
- No Caith Dionysius, they are three whether
- the Sabellians vill or not; or else there is
- ne Trinity: Which he lockd on as agreat
- ablurdier to take avar, riv Ociaer reiada
- the Divine Trinity. OF What: OF mere
- Names or Fnercies) That iS nO TrinitY;
- For there is but onc subsiltine Person of se-
- parate and divided Substances: That the
- Sabellians choushe must follo but boch
- the Dionrsiuss deniedit. Lnd in another
- Desoram Id ca 18r0
- UETO IV MOVac ni n
- 50nbe TO aNOr.
- Passase there mention d, Dio-
- nysus ot Alexandria altertsthe
- Trinity in Onity. Buc betore
- Dionysius, he quotes a passase
- Ol Clemens Romanus Concern.
- ins Father, Son and LToly Chost.
- Wrhich actribures Lise dictinctly i0 them.
- Nor Lise cannot belons t0 a Name Or
- Linerer, and cheretore must imply a Per-
- Son.
- Buc thac Which is most material to our
- purpole, is the Publick Doxolocy in che
- Church oF Neo. Caesarea, broushe in by
- Grecory Thaumatureus. S. Basil sires ave
- ry hish Character oE lum, 25 ot a Perion
- et excraordinary Piety and Exactnels ot
- Lile
- 7e145
- n Onoi, d DEdsn d
- HVeIO TMOES ZSISCS, u
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 200. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0272?run=74