A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 202
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.92.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- AVindication of
- ould fain have charged this Doxoloe a5
- an Innoration on S. Basil, becaule it at-
- tribured equal FIonour t0 F’ather, Son and
- loly Ghost Wtrieh the Aerians would nOr
- endure; but ther Caid, That the Son vas
- 10 be honoured ont in Subordination t0 the
- Father, and the LToly Chost as inferrour t0
- borh. But S. Basit proves trom Scrixture
- an Pquality of FJonour to be due tothem:
- and parricularis trom the Form of Bap-
- rism, c. 10. Wherein rhe Son and FToly Chost
- are jorned with the Father, oithout any
- note of Distinction. And vohat more pro-
- per token of a Conjunction in the same Dic-
- nity, than beine put rocether in such a
- manner.
- ESpecially considerins thele trro things.
- T. The extream scaloulie ot the sewittr
- Nation, 25to jornins the Creatures with
- Cod in ony chine that relared to Divine
- HIOnour. But a5S. Basit areues, IF the Son
- ivere a Creature, then ve must believe in
- rhe Creator, and the Creature tocether: and
- By the same reason that one Creature isjoyn-
- ed the whole Creation may be joyned voith
- him; but laith he, ve are not to imarine
- the least Disunion or Separation between l’a-
- ther, Son and TToly Ghost; nor that they are
- three distinet parts of one inseparable Beine.
- but that there is an indivisible Conjunction
- O
- 2
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 202. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0274?run=74