Search the Nachlass

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 222

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.93.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. A Vindication of
  2. into that Religion which proceeds fromGod
  3. the Facher, and deliver d By his Son, and
  4. confirmed by the Testimony of the TToly
  5. Chost. So much we grancis implicd, Due
  6. Ehe Quection Aill remains, Wwhether the
  7. Son and Foly Chost are tiere to be consi-
  8. der d onty in order to their Operations, or
  9. Whecher che Perlons oFche son and FToly
  10. Ghost. Erom Whom chole FHeCts Came, are
  11. not here chiesy intended: Por il no
  12. more had been meane, buc thele ERectS,
  13. then cherishe Form of admistion had noc
  14. been, into the Name of Father, Son and
  15. FToly Chost; but in the Name of the Father
  16. alone, 25 Revealine him(elF by his Son, and
  17. Consirmine it by che miraculous NV ortes oF
  18. ehc LToly Ghost. For chele are only sub.
  19. servient ACS to che detion oF God the Fa-
  20. ther, as the only subsistine Person.
  21. 5. They ceII uS, That it is in vain, not
  22. 10 say ridiculousty pretended, that a Per-
  23. son or Thine is God because ve are baptized
  24. into it; for some vere baptize d into Moles,
  25. and others into Johrs Baprism, and so
  26. Moles and Tohn Baptist would beCods; and
  27. +0 be baptized into a Person or Persons, and
  28. in the name of such a Person is the same
  29. thine. Crrant chis; vet chere is a great
  30. difierence betveen beins baptized in che
  31. name oF a Minister of Baprism, and ot the
  32. Author

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 222. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0294?run=74