A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 235
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- the Doetrine of the Trinier.
- it, only an uncertain supposition of ve tnou
- not hat. And cheretore it is paralleld,
- more chan once, with the Indian Philo- L. 2. c. 13.
- Sophers, Fle tenew not mhat; Wbich suppor- Sect. 19.
- ted the Fortoile, that supported the F. lC. Chap. 23.
- phane, that supported the Farth; (0 Sub- sect. 2.
- stance vas found our only to support Acci-
- dents. And, that when we talk of Sub-
- stances we talt like Children Woho beins ate d
- a Duestion, about somenhat which theytenou
- not, readilr sive this satisfactory Ansver,
- thatit is somethine
- IE chis be the cruth of the Casc, we
- must Rill talk like Children, and l Unow
- noc hor ic can be remedied. For, il WC
- cannoc come ac a racional Idea Ot Sub-
- stance, re con have no Principle ot cer-
- camey 1050 upon in chis DCBaCC.
- Ido noc (aY, chac we can have aclear
- Edea of Substance, cicher by Sensation Or
- Restection; bur trom hence largue, ThaE
- this is a very insufficient Distribution ot
- the Ideas necestary 10 ReatOn. FOr bc.
- sides chele, chere must le lome senerat
- Ideas, Wrhich che mind doch FOrm, HOE
- Oy meer comparine those Ldeas it has sot
- from sense or Refection; but by FOrmin
- distinet seneral Norions, ol chines trom
- particular Ideas. And amons chele se
- ral Norions, or racional Ideas, Sub-
- stance
Cite
A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 235. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0307?run=74