Search the Nachlass

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 262

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. AVindication of, ec.
  2. ture, ic mus be in a may aerceable t0
  3. the infinice Perfections oF ir. And no
  4. objection can be calcen trom che Idea os
  5. Cod, to overthrow a Trinity Ot C0. exi-
  6. stine Persons in the same Divine Psence.
  7. For necessarr Existence doch imply a Co.
  8. existence ot the Divine Persons; and the
  9. Onicy oftheDirinc Essence, chattherecan-
  10. not Deluch a ditterence ol individuat Sub-
  11. stances, 25 chere isamons mankcind. BuE
  12. chele chinss are laid e0 De above our Rea-
  13. son, IE not contrary to it, and even suct
  14. are laidto De repugnant eo our Relision.
  15. 2. Thac theretore is the nexe thine 10
  16. Dc caresuliy Examin d, Whecher Mysteries
  17. of Faith, Or Matters oF Revelation a-
  18. bove our Reason, are to De rejected by 11S.
  19. And a Thine is laid to he above our Rea-
  20. son, Wvhen we can have no clear and distinet
  21. Idea oF ic in cur Minas: And, that if we
  22. haveno Tdeas of a thine. it is certaintr but
  23. tost labour for us to rrouble our selves about
  24. nicus not it; aDd chat, if such Doctrines be propo-
  25. Nyst. P. 28.d Wwhich ve cannot understand, ve must
  26. have neu Pouers, and Orsans for the Per-
  27. ception of them.
  28. Neare tar trom detendins contradicti
  29. ons to our naturat Notions (OF Wrhrich I
  30. have spoken already) buc chat Whuich we
  31. are nom upon is, rhether any Doctrine
  32. Ma)
  33. Christia

Cite

A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity, fol. 262. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0334?run=74