An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 79
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- Simple Modes of Space
- But a partial consideration is nor separatine. ANan mas consider Light
- in elie sun, withoutits Heac; or Mobilies in Body wichout its Extenlion,
- rithour chintins oE their separation. Onc is ouly a partial Conlideration.
- terminatins in one alone; and the other is a Consideration ol both, 25
- existins separaretr.
- 3. T4. Fhiraly, The Barts oF pure Space, are immovable, wtrich (ol-
- lous trom cheir inseparabilier; Morion beins nochins but chanse ot dis
- Pance betreen any tiro chinso: Butchis cannot be betreen Parts char are
- inseparable; Which cherelore must needs De at pervetual relt onc amon est
- anOtHer.
- Thus the clear and distinet Idea oP simple Space distinguistres it plain-
- IV, and sutticienels from Body; Cince irs Parts are inseparable, immovable,
- and ithour resistence tothe Motion ot Body.
- G. 25. TF any one asteme, What chis Space, I speak ot, is: Pwillrellhim,
- uhen he tells me what his Fxtension iS. FOr t0 (aY, a5 is ulualles done,
- That Extension is to have partes extra partes, is to lay onls, That PX
- tension iS. Extenson: For Whatam Ithe becter informed in che nature ot
- Exrension, Wrhien lam told, That Fxtension is to hare parts that are ex-
- iended, exterior to parts that are extended, l. C. Extension consilts of Cx
- tended Paris: AS il oneaskins. What a Fibre vas; P Mould ansver him,
- Thac it ras a chins made ux of several Fibres: Wouldhehereby beena-
- bled to understand wrhat a Fibre as, berterthanhe did betore: Or rather,
- evould he not have realon to thint, that my desion mas to matre spore
- wich him, rather chan seriouas eo instruct him:
- 8. 16. Those who contend chat Space and Body are the same, brine
- ehis Dilemma: Fither ehis space is Pormethins or nothins; it nochine DC
- betreen tmo Bodies, they must neceslarily touch; il it bc allowed to b0
- somethins, chey aste, Whecher it be Body or Spirit: Fohich P an-
- siver by another Duection, Who toldthem, that thero as, or could b0
- nothing but solid Beinss Wrhich could noc thinle, and chinking Beings that
- vere not extended: Which is all they mean by the terms Body and Spirit.
- 8. 17. IE it be demanded (as usually it is) Wrhether this Space void of
- Body. De Substance or Accident, I Mall readily ansiver, Pbno nOE; nOr
- Mall be alhamed to omn my senorance, rill they chat aste, pew me aclear
- dictine Idea ot Substance.
- 6. 28. Pendearour, as much as Pcan, to deliver my self trom those
- Fallacies, Wrhich e are apt to pur uxon our selves, by tatins Words For
- Thirss. Er helps nor our lonorance, ro teisu a Unomledse, Where WC
- havenone, by matsins a noise with Sounds, without elear and distinct
- Sixifications. Names made at pleasure, neither alter the nature ot chines
- nor makce us understand them, bur asthier are lions ot, arid sand for csear
- and distinct Ideas. And I desire those wrho lay s0 much strels on thelound
- OE theso uro Syllables, Substance, to consider, Whether applyins il, 25
- Cherdo, tothe insinite incomprehensible CO D, to sinite Spirits, and to
- Bod7, it be in the lame sense; and Whether it Rand sor ehie lame Idea,
- irten cach ot those chree so different Beines are called Substances: It
- f0, Whecher it will not chence tollow, That Ciod, Spirits, and Boc), agree.
- irs in the same commonnature of substance, differ not otherwile than
- ina bare dicterent modification of that Substance; as a Frec and a Pebble.
- beins in the lame sense bodied, and aprecins in the common nature of
- Body, differ only in a bare modification ol that common matter; Wrhiet
- erill be a very hari Doctrine. IF they Cay, That ther apply it ro G0d,
- anite Spirits, and Matrer, in three ditterent lignitications, and that it
- ctands for one Idea, Wtren CO D is laid t0 be a Substance; lor anoctier,
- When
Cite
An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 79. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/778263916:0095?run=74