Search the Nachlass

An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 183

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.90.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. CMaP. Ld LL
  2. True and F’alse Ideas.
  3. formier and resemblance is axtributed to it, wrtrich it has nOt. But vet, il
  4. havino framed such an Idea in my Mlind, Without chinkino, cither that
  5. Existence, or thename Man, Or Tartar, belones to it, P Will calt it Man,
  6. Or Partar, I mar be justly chouohe phantastical in the Namino; but nOE
  7. erroncous in y fudgent; nor the dea anr vay false.
  8. 6. 26. Vpon che Wtiole matrer, P think, That Our Ideas, 25 they are
  9. considered by the Mind, cither in reference to the prover signilication ot
  10. theirNames; or in relerence to therealiey oF Thines, mar very sicly be
  11. called riche, or vrone Ideas, accordins as they agree, or dilagree to those
  12. Patterns to vrhich chez are reterred. But it ans onc had rather call them
  13. true, or False, tis tr he use a liberey, Which everr onc has, to call Thinos
  14. by those Names he chins best; chourh in proprietr of Specch, TrutH, or
  15. Falthood, Will, Ichinth, scarce agree to them, but as thez, lome az or
  16. ottrer, virtually contain in them lome mental Proxosition. The Ideas
  17. thac are in a Mlans Mind, simpls considered, cannot berrone, untels
  18. Complex ones, Wherein inconsittent parts are jumbled cogether. AII other
  19. Ldeas are in themselres rioht; and the lnomlecse abour chem, risht and
  20. true Rnomlede: Dut when e come to reter them to any thins, as to
  21. their Patrerns and Archetypes, then ther are capable of being Wrons, 25
  22. Far asther dilaprec wich such ArchetypeS.
  23. 6. 27. Tlarins thus siven an aceount of the original, TOrIS, and exteHE
  24. oFour ideas, Wich several other Conliderations, about chese (I knor nor
  25. Whether Imay Cay) Instruments, or Materials, ol our hnomledoe, the
  26. ethodI ar Arst propoled to my selE, vould no require, that l Mould
  27. immediatelz proceed to Mem, vtat ule the Inderstandine malies ot
  28. chem, and What Anomledoe ve have by them. This was chat intict
  29. in ehe tirst general viem lhad ofthis Subject, as all thacl thoupht
  30. PBould have to do: lut uxon a nearer approach, I find, that there
  31. is so clole a connexion betrreen ideas and Words; and our abstract
  32. Ideas, and general Words, have loconstant arelation onetoanother, that
  33. ic is impossible to speal cleartr and distinctly or our Rnowlecge, irhicu
  34. al conlils in Propolitions, without considerine, trct, the Nature, Ile,
  35. andSienitication ol Larguase; Which cheretore must be the bulinels or
  36. the next BOOlE.
  37. C

Cite

An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 183. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/778263916:0199?run=74