Leibniz Legible

Machine transcription of the Leibniz Nachlass

Search the Nachlass

An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 198

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.92.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. Names of simple Ideas.
  2. all: And cheresore a Detinition, Which is proverly nothins but the sewine
  3. themeanins oF one Word by several ochers, noc lignitying cach che larrie
  4. thino, can in the Names of simple Ldeas have no Place.
  5. 6. 8. Fhenot observins this difference in our Pdeas, and their NamES,
  6. has produced that eminent trittins in the Schools, which isso casie t0
  7. De observed, in the definitions they gire us of lome sew of these simple
  8. Ideas. Foras tottie orearest pare ot them, even those Masters ot Dehni-
  9. tions, vere tain eo leave them untouchd, meerl by the imposibilitr
  10. ther sound in ic. What more exquilite Farcon could the Wit ot Nan in-
  11. vent, than this Detinition, The Act of a beine in Pover, as far forth as
  12. in Pover, Wrhich vould purzle ans rational elan, tonhom it vas not
  13. already Known by its famous ablurditi, to guess what Nord ic could e.
  14. ver De supposed to be the Lixplication ot. IF Tully astring a Dutchman Wlrat
  15. Beweexince Was, Mould have receired this Explication in his omn Lan
  16. suase, that it ras Actusentis in potentia quatenus in potentia; Iaste Wrhe-
  17. ther any one can imagine he could thereby have understood wrhat the
  18. Word Beweeringe lignitied, or have guessed What Ldea a Dutchman ordinari-
  19. Iy had in his Nind, and irould signitie to another, Wrhen he uled that sound.
  20. 6. 9. Nor hare the modern Philosophers, irho have endeavoured 10
  21. thron of the Farcon oF the Schools, and speakc intolligiblz, mueh bet-
  22. ter succecded in detinins simple Ldeas, Whether by explainins their C au-
  23. ses, or any othermise. The Aromists, Who detine Motionto De a passaze
  24. fromone place to another, What do they more than pur one lynonymous
  25. Nord For another: For What is Passase ocher chan Motion: And il they
  26. aere astced what Passase as; Iloir vouldchey berter define it than by
  27. Motion: For is it nor et least as prover and signiticant, to lay, P’assare is a
  28. Motion from one place to another, 2s to lay, Morion is a Passare, etc. This
  29. istotranstate, and not to detine, when we chanse ero Words of thelame
  30. Signitication one For another; which irhen onc is better understood
  31. ehian the ocher, maz serve todiscover irhat Idea the unknomn Ctands For;
  32. but is vers far trom a Detinition, unless e will lay, erery Enolistr Word
  33. in theDictionarr, is the detinition of the Larin Word it ansivers, and
  34. thatMotion is a detinition OF MotuS. Nor will the successive application
  35. of the parts of the Superticies of one Body, to those of another, Wvtrich the
  36. Cartesians sire us, prove a much becrer detinition ol Motion, irhen well
  37. examincd.
  38. 6. XO. The Act of Perspicuous, as far forth as perspicuous, is anorher
  39. Peripaterick definition ot a simple Idea; Wrhich choueli noc more absurd
  40. chanthe former of Morion, zec betraysits Vsclelsnels and Inlignificaner
  41. more plainlz, Decause Experience rill casils convince any onc, that ic
  42. cannot makre the meanine oF the Word Lichr (Wrhich it pretends to de-
  43. FinC) at all understood by a blind Mtan: bue the detinition of Motion ap.
  44. Peaxsnot at tirst sistur so uselels, because it scapes this way ofTrial. For
  45. Enis simple Idea entrins by the Touch as well as Sighes tis impossible
  46. eother an Example of ans onc, Wrhro has no ocher ey eo ger the Idea ot
  47. norion, but barely by che detinirion of that Name. When the Cariesi-
  48. ans tellus, that Licht is a great number of litele Clobules, sritins briste-
  49. ly on the borrom ol the FyC, they speak a lirtle more intelligibly thanthe
  50. Schools: Dut vet thele Words never (o ell understood, vould matre the
  51. Ideas the Word Liehe RandsFor, no more bnoon to a Man chat under.
  52. Sands it not betore, chan it one Mould tell him, ThaE LisHE WaS nO
  53. chins buc aCompany of litele Tennis- baIIS, Which Fairies all Day lons
  54. Arook ich Rackets againct lome Mens Fore heads, Whils thes passed
  55. by others. Forerancins his eixplication ot che chins r0 be ere; vet e
  56. Idea
  57. BOC

Cite

An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 198. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/778263916:0214?run=74