Search the Nachlass

An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 240

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.89.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. Impersmin Nor
  2. dilisent in oblerrus cu terter, aiset sels Masieriat, volutire, and impe
  3. rous, in impolis ou on leule ala llesprctations o the LatTOT.
  4. C tt1LL. 2
  5. Of che Abuse of Words.
  6. G. F. DD Fsides the impertection chat is naturally in Language, and chie
  7. obscurits and contusion that is so hard to be aroided in che
  8. Ose OFWords, there are several wilful saults and Neclects, Whieh Men
  9. are suiler ot, in the war ot Communication, Wrhereby cher render these
  10. signs less clear and distinet in cheir signification, chan naturally they necd
  11. 10b0.
  12. 5. 2. First, In Ehis Kinc, che Arst and most palpable abuse is, tlie v.
  13. Sins OF Words, Without clear and distinet Ideas; or, Whuich is worle, (ions
  14. richour any thing signified. OF Fhele FHErC ATO LWO TONES:
  15. P. One maz obserre, in all Languages, certain Words, that if ther DC
  16. exammined, will be found, in cheir trst Original, and their appropriated
  17. DsC, noc to sand for any clear and distinet Pdeas. Thele, for the most
  18. part, the several Sects oE Philosophy and Religion have introduced. FOr
  19. their Authors, or Promoters, cither attectins lomethins lnsular, and oue
  20. Ot the nar ot commmon apprehentions, or to suppore lone ltranse Oxi-
  21. nions, or cover lome Wealnels of cheir Hypothelis, seldom fail to coin
  22. nem Words, and such as, when ther come to be examined, may
  23. justiy be called insienisicant Terms. For havine cither had no determi-
  24. table Collection of Ideas annexed eo them, hen they vere trst invented;
  25. Or at least luch a5, is ell examined, rill be found inconlictent, tis no von-
  26. der is alterards, in the vulsar ule ofthe lame party, ther remain empey
  27. Sounds, with litele or no lignitication, amongst thole irho think it e-
  28. nough to have them osten in their mouths, as the distinguistino Chara-
  29. eters oF their Church, or School, ithout much croublins their headsto
  30. examine, Wrhat arc the precile Ideas ther Hand For. Imall not necd here
  31. Foncap up instances, everr ones readins and conversation will sufficient-
  32. Iy Furni him: Or iF he anes tobe better Aored, FHC SreaF MInE-MaIterS
  33. ot these kind ot Terms, I mean the Schoolmen andMteraphy licians, (under
  34. Wtrich, I chint, ehe disputins natural and moral Philosophers ot thele lat-
  35. FeF AgeS, may De comprehended,) hare whercrichal abundanty t0 con-
  36. tent him.
  37. 6. 3. II. Othersthere Be, irho extend this abuse yet Farther, Wrho tate
  38. fo litele care to lar br Words, Which in their primarr notation have
  39. scarce any clear and distinet ideas they are annexed to, that by an un-
  40. Pardonable negligence, they tamiliariy use Words, Which the Proprietr ot
  41. Lanouase has affixed to vers important Ideas, they ule chem, IlaY,
  42. without any distinct meanine at aII. WVisdom, Glory, Grace, ecc. are Words
  43. Freguent enouxh in every Mtans mouth; but il a oreat mans ol those
  44. vlio use them, Mould be asticd, What ches mean by them: thes wouldbe
  45. aE a Rtand, and not bnor irtat to ansiver: A plain proot, thac though chiey
  46. hare learned those Sounds, and have them ready at their Pongues ends,
  47. yet there are no clear and distinct Ideas laid ux in their Minds, wrhick
  48. are 0 bC expressed r0 ochers by rhicm:

Cite

An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 240. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/778263916:0256?run=74