An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 272
Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.
Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text
The machine reads it as
- lixtent of FTumane Lnomledse.
- BoOR LV.
- And if ie linew chele primory Oualities oF Bodies, wemight have realon to
- tiove, e mislut be able tolinor a great deal more ot thele Opcrations ot
- ehem onc uxon another: But our Minds not beine able to discover any
- connexion betwixt chele primary qualities of Bodies, and ehe lenlarions that
- ore produced in us by them, e can never be able to ectablith certain and
- undoubred Rules, ot the Consequence or Co existence ot any secundaris
- Oulities, thoush re could discorer the lize, tigure, or motion of thole in-
- Cible Parts, Trhich immediatelr producethem. We are (0 tartrom lnorine
- Wrhattigure, sizo, or motion oF parts produce a rellor Colour, 2 lveet
- Tacte, or a Marp Sound, that re can by no means conceire hou any
- Sire, fgure, or motion otany Particles, can possibly produce in us ttie Idea
- oF ans Colour, Talte, or Sound Whatsoever, chere isno conceivable con-
- rexion becrixt the one andthe other.
- 5. 24. In vain theretore all re endeavour to discover by our
- Tdeas, Cthe onlr true way of certain and universal Rnowledse,) Wvhat
- Other Ideas are to be found constanels joined with thac of our com-
- plex idea ot ans Substance; since we neither bnom the real Consticurion
- ot the minute Parrs, on Which their Oualities do depend; nor, did We
- Hnom them, could re discover any neceltars connexion betreen them,
- and any ofelie secundary Oualities; Wrhich is neceltarr tobe done, Betore
- re can certainy Hnowtheir necessarr co. existenco. S0 that let our coniplex
- Idea oF any Species os Substances, be What it vill, we can hardly, trom
- the simple ideas contained in it, certainty determine the necellarr co-
- existence ofany other Oualiey trhatloever. Our Rnormledse in all these
- Enquiries, reaches very lictle Farcher than our Experienco. Indced, Pome
- ferr os etie primary dualiries have a necestary devendence, and visible
- connexion one with anocher, as Figure neceslarili suppoleS FXtenSION,
- receirins or communicatine Morion by impulle, suppoles salidier. But
- thouohthese, and perhraps lome others of our Ldeas have; yet there are
- Porre seu ofthem, that have a visible Connexion one with another, that we
- ean by Intuition or Demonstration, dilcorer the co.existence ot verr for
- oFche Oualities are eo be found uniced in Substances; and we are lese
- only tothe assistence oFour Senses, to makie Bnon to us trhat Oualities
- they contain. For al the Oualities that are co existent in any subject,
- Wittiout chis dexendence and evident connerion of their Ideas one vict
- another, e cannor lnom cerrainly to co exist ans Parther, than FxPe-
- rience, by our Senles, informs us. Thus thoush re sce the yellor Co-
- Jour, and upon trial find the Weight, Malleablenels, Pusibility, and Fixed.
- Bels, chat are united in a piece oF Ciold; vet because no one ot cheso
- Ideas hasany evident dependence, or necellars connexion with the other;
- re cannot certaints bnoir, that where any Tour oF chele are, the Histh
- will be chere also, hon hishly probable foever it may be: Becausethe
- higheit Probabilies, amounes not 1o Certainey; wichour which, there
- can be no true Rnomledse. For this coexiltence can be no Farther
- trown, than ic is perceired; and it cannot be perceived, buc cirter in
- particular Subjects, By the obserration of our Senses, or in general, Dy che
- necellari connexion oE the Ldeas Themselves.
- 8. 25. As to incompatibility or repuenancy to co existence, We may KnOW.
- chac any Subjeet can have ot cach lort ot primaris Qualities, but one parri
- Cular aE once, v. 5. Cach particular Extension Ficure, number ot Parts, Mori
- om exeludes all orher of each kind. The likro also is certain of all sensible
- Ideas peculiar to esch Sense; For Whatever of cach hind is prelent in
- ans Subject, excludes all ocher oF Fhat lOrT; v. g. no one Subject can
- have cWo Srgello, er Cro Colours, at che lume rime. L0 chis, pertape
- vil.
Cite
An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. 272. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/778263916:0288?run=74