Leibniz Legible

Machine transcription of the Leibniz Nachlass

Search the Nachlass

An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. -

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. moretheir removed, the less their
  2. Proot.
  3. IT. Tet Llistory is of creat use.
  4. F2. In thines which sense cannot dis-
  5. cover, Analoey is the ereat Rule of
  6. Probabiliti.
  7. 13. One case where contrary F. xperi-
  8. E.CT.
  9. ence lessens not the Testimony.
  10. is the hichest certainty.
  11. CH AL.
  12. O5 Reason.
  13. I. Various senisications of the word
  14. Reason.
  15. 2. Wherein Reasonine consists.
  16. 3. Tts four parts.
  17. 4. Syllogism not the creat Instrument
  18. of Reason.
  19. 5. Tlelps litrle in Demonstration, less
  20. in Probabilitr.
  21. 6. Serves not to increase our Rnom-
  22. ledee, but fence with it.
  23. 7. Other helps Bould be soucht.
  24. 8. IVe Reason atout Particulars.
  25. 9. First, Reason fails us for vant of
  26. Ideas.
  27. 20. Secondly, Because of obseure and
  28. imperfect Ideas.
  29. TI. Thirdly, For vant of intermediate
  30. Ideas.
  31. 12. Fourrhly, Because of vorone Prin-
  32. ciples:
  33. 23. Fischly, Because of doubiful
  34. terms.
  35. 24. Our biehest deoree of Knouledee
  36. is intuitive without reasonine.
  37. 15. The next is Demonstration byrea-
  38. Sonine.
  39. 16. T0 supply the narronness of this,
  40. ve have nochine but fudement up-
  41. on probable reasonine.
  42. T7. Intaition Demonstration, fudement.
  43. F8. Consequences ofWords, and Con-
  44. sequences of Ideas.
  45. 29. Four sorts of Arouments: First,
  46. Ad Verecundiam.
  47. 20. Secondly, Ad Tororantiam.
  48. 2F. Thiralr, Ad Flominem.
  49. ConoB
  50. 22. Fourthly, Ad Fudicium.
  51. 23. Above, contrars, una aorane 10
  52. Reason.
  53. 24. Reason and Faith not opposite.
  54. ITAP
  55. .F4. The bare Testimony os Revelation Of Faith and Reason, ana cet astmet
  56. Provinces.
  57. T. Necessary e0 tnou their Boun-
  58. daries.
  59. 2. Faith and Reason what, as contra-
  60. distineuised.
  61. 3. Noneu simple Idea can be conver-
  62. ed bytraditional Revelation.
  63. 4. Fraditional Revelation may make
  64. us tenou Propositions tnovable al
  65. Se by Reason but not with the same
  66. certainty that Reason doth.
  67. 5. Revelation cannot be admitied a-
  68. cainst the clear evidence of Rea-
  69. oLC.t
  70. Ton.
  71. 6. Traditional Revelation much less.
  72. S. Lhines above Reason.
  73. 8. Or not contrary eo Reason, if revea.
  74. led are matter of Faith.
  75. 9. Revelation, in matters uhere Rea-
  76. son cannot judse, or hut probably,
  77. ouxht to be hearkene d 10.
  78. 20. In matters here Reason can af-
  79. ford certain tenouledee that i5 10
  80. behearkened to.
  81. CT. IF the bonndaries be not (et ve-
  82. tween Faith and Reason, no Fn-
  83. thusiasm, or extravasancy in Re-
  84. licion can be contraduted.
  85. TIA P.
  86. 3
  87. OfWrons Assent, or Ltou.
  88. SECi
  89. T. Causes of Frrour.
  90. 2. First, Want of Proofs.
  91. 3. Obi. What salt become of those
  92. Who vant them, ansivered.
  93. a. People hindred from Finguiry.
  94. 3. Seconaly. Want of skill +0 use
  95. B. Lhira-
  96. Them.

Cite

An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding, fol. - . Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/778263916:0399?run=74