Search the Nachlass

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 4

Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. Mean line confidence on this page: 0.91.

Original at the GWLB · Page image · Annotations (IIIF) · Download text

The machine reads it as

  1. A
  2. ertich are oE greatest Concern ID uS,
  3. Wvhich Idorbe not to do, it beine clear
  4. to me, that Wrhaterer re can kno at all
  5. usE DC discoverable bY Mr. LockS Prin
  6. ciples; For l cannot find any other ras
  7. tolnorledse, or that re have anr one
  8. Idea not derired From Senlation and Re.
  9. Aection. But let us sec hou thole points
  10. inar De establistid on them, For wtrich
  11. the Remarter doubts their Force; and
  12. Airst oF Noralier, or Natural Religi
  13. On ot wrtrich, he thus Degins:
  14. . 4. Asto Moraliey, me thint the sreat Foun-
  15. dation of il is the distinction of C0od and
  16. Fivil. Viriue and Vice. And I de
  17. not find that my Fres, Fars. Nostrils or
  18. any other ontward senses, mate any distinction
  19. of thesethines, as they do ofColours, Sounds,
  20. 8cc.- Nor from any Ideas tahen in from
  21. them, or fromtheir Reports, am I Conscions
  22. that Id., or can conclude that there 25 such
  23. a distinction in che Nature of things. Tr
  24. 2. X. p. 8. Wvhrich WOrds, he Pays, he thouett he hact
  25. tatien in cnoueh to comprehend both
  26. MIr. LocteS Principles ot Knowlecee, sen
  27. Parion and Reftection, Wrhich I Bould not
  28. have thouptit, but since he omns hre de-
  29. siend them to do s0, re will suxpolo
  30. boch exprest, and proceed rith hun.
  31. allom that me may infer from Observation
  32. arid Reason that such a distinction 25 use
  33. ful to Scciety, but both Philosophers and Di
  34. vines, vou lnom mate a more immutable
  35. and intrinsicl. Distinction, Wohich is that
  36. ccint malee out from pour Principles

Cite

A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock, fol. 4. Machine transcription, not an edition: Leibniz Legible (model FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74). https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0016?run=74